Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Track the centreline
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: no landing flap set and centreline 14.4° off, against a 1° limit.
At the 500 ft gate: centreline 4.2° off, against a 1° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,856 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 545 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from runway 10 at 29S Gardiner, the DA40 aircraft began its takeoff roll, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 75 kt in 452 meters, which was 45% of the available runway length. The local weather conditions at the time were characterized by a temperature of 20 °C and a wind of 18 kt at 214 °, resulting in a crosswind component of 18 kt and a tailwind component of 3 kt.
As the aircraft climbed to a cruising altitude, it transitioned from a climb to a level cruise, reaching an altitude of 12,007 ft asl in 8 minutes and covering 12 nm. The enroute level cruise phase lasted for 109 minutes, during which the aircraft covered a distance of 199 nm. The descent phase was initiated multiple times, with the aircraft descending from various altitudes to reach the final approach altitude. The final approach to runway 16 at KMYL McCall Municipal Airport was conducted from the north, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 185.0 ° at 1 nm and 416 ft agl.
The landing was executed with good threshold height, and the threshold speed was well above the target at 83 kt. The touchdown point was 107 m beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 61 kt and an excellent touchdown rate of -58 fpm. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the runway rollout alignment was also satisfactory. The total landing distance was 700 m, which was 38% of the available runway length. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area in less than 1 minute, covering a distance of less than 1 nm. The total flight distance was 251 nm, and the flight duration was 143 minutes, with a fuel consumption of 32 kg.
The final approach to runway 16 at KMYL McCall Municipal Airport from the north was executed with precision, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 185.0° at 1 nm and 416 ft above ground level. The approach quality was excellent, with a good threshold height achieved. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target, reaching 83 kt, which may have been due to the prevailing wind conditions. The wind was blowing at 12 kt from 270°, resulting in a 12 kt crosswind component.
As the aircraft touched down on the runway, the touchdown point was 107 m beyond the touchdown zone, which was slightly beyond the ideal location. Nevertheless, the touchdown speed of 61 kt was good, and the touchdown rate of -58 fpm was excellent, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, with the aircraft maintaining its centerline alignment throughout the touchdown phase. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 14 °C and a wind speed of 12 kt, did not appear to have a significant impact on the landing.
The total landing distance of 700 m was 38% of the runway length, which was within acceptable limits. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, with the aircraft maintaining its centerline alignment throughout the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was scored 95.7%, reflecting a high level of proficiency and control demonstrated by the pilot.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values