Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with five checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 500 ft gate: off the runway's 3° glideslope.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,545 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,545 m of the 2,280 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 454 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from KBTV Burlington International Airport, the Embraer E175 began its journey with a departure roll from runway 33. The aircraft accelerated to liftoff speed of 150 kt, clearing the runway threshold at 1,292 m, which accounted for 54% of the runway's length. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 27 °C, with a wind speed of 11 kt at 30°, resulting in a crosswind component of 11 kt and a headwind component of 2 kt.
As the aircraft climbed to its enroute cruise altitude, it passed overhead Winooski, Vermont, and continued to ascend to 32,025 ft asl, a gain of 30,762 ft in 10 minutes, covering 81 nm. The enroute level cruise phase started 6 miles northwest of the NY61 Eagle Nest Seaplane Base, lasting 20 minutes and covering 449 nm. The aircraft then began its descent from 31,930 ft asl to 12,378 ft asl, a decrease of 19,552 ft in 11 minutes, covering 94 nm. This was followed by a brief level cruise phase 26 miles west of South Haven, Michigan, lasting 3 minutes and covering 31 nm. The final descent phase started 15 miles east of North Chicago, Illinois, and the aircraft touched down on runway 27R at KORD Chicago O'Hare International Airport.
The landing performance was notable, with a touchdown distance of 453 m, which was within acceptable limits. However, the touchdown speed of 128 kt was slightly above the target, and the touchdown rate of -236 fpm was fair. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, but the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 13.3 m from the centreline. The total landing distance was 1,462 m, accounting for 64% of the runway's length. The aircraft then taxied to the parking area, covering 4 nm in 5 minutes. The total flight distance was 707 nm, with a flight time of 67 minutes and a fuel consumption of 2,675 kg.
The Embraer E175 touched down on runway 27R at KORD Chicago O'Hare International Airport with a score of 93.4%. The aircraft began its final approach from the east, heading 270.0° at 4 nm and 1,423 ft above ground level (agl). The approach quality was satisfactory, with a threshold height of 56 ft agl, slightly above the target. The threshold speed of 137 kt was significantly higher than the target, indicating a potential for a long rollout.
As the aircraft made contact with the runway, the touchdown distance of 453 m was within acceptable limits. However, the touchdown speed of 128 kt was a little fast, and the touchdown rate of -236 fpm was fair. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating a high degree of control and precision during the landing. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 28 °C and a wind of 24 kt at 189°, contributed to a challenging landing environment, with a crosswind of 23 kt and a headwind of 4 kt.
The total landing distance of 1,462 m, accounting for 64% of the runway length, was acceptable. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 13.3 m from the centreline, indicating a minor deviation from the desired path. Overall, the landing was satisfactory, with a score of 93.4%, reflecting a good performance in terms of approach quality, touchdown characteristics, and runway alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values