Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on approach to be at 138 kt by the stabilisation gate, not just by the threshold.
What happened: The approach was too fast at the stabilisation gate, crossing the threshold at 136 kt against a VREF of 138 kt.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator against 138 kt at the stabilisation gate.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed 43 kt FAST on the reference speed of 138 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,189 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 362 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The Boeing 737-800 taxied from the parking area to runway 29 at UWKD Kazan International Airport in 3 minutes, covering less than 1 nm.
During the departure roll on runway 29, the aircraft accelerated to a liftoff speed of 153 kt and left the ground after a takeoff distance of 1,206 m, which represented 32 % of the runway; ambient temperature was 23 °C with a 3 kt headwind from 295° and no cross-wind component.
Climb commenced overhead UWKD, with the airplane ascending from 1,305 ft asl to 38,991 ft asl - a gain of 37,686 ft - in 44 minutes while traversing 341 nm.
Level cruise began 18 mi east of UKRR Chernihiv Shestovytsia Airport and continued for 136 minutes, during which the flight covered 1,141 nm.
Descent was initiated 39 mi southwest of At-Bashi, descending from 38,678 ft asl to 5,803 ft asl - a loss of 32,874 ft - in 17 minutes and over a distance of 115 nm.
The final approach to runway 26 at ZWSH Kashgar Airport was flown from the east on a heading of 266.0° at 4 nm and 1,275 ft agl.
Landing on runway 26 was achieved with a threshold speed of 136 kt; touchdown occurred 365 m down the runway at 129 kt, a rate of minus 278 fpm, and a lateral offset of 3.6 m from the centreline. The total landing distance was 1,001 m, representing 31 % of the 3,189 m runway, and local conditions were 34 °C with a 3 kt wind from 160°, a 3 kt cross-wind and a 1 kt tailwind component.
Runway rollout alignment was reported as very good.
The aircraft taxied from the runway to the parking area in 1 minutes, covering less than 1 nm.
Overall, the flight covered 1,605 nm, took 203 minutes, and consumed 9,483 kg of fuel.
The final approach to runway 26 at ZWSH Kashgar Airport was flown from the east on a heading of 266.0° at 4 NM and 1,275 ft AGL. Ambient temperature was 34 °C with a wind of 3 kt from 160°, including a 3 kt cross-wind component and a 1 kt tail-wind component. The approach was conducted within the parameters that contributed to the overall score of 99.2 %.
At threshold the aircraft presented a good height and the threshold speed was good at 136 kt. The flare was executed in line with the expected profile for the aircraft type.
Touchdown occurred 365 m down the runway, which is classified as good. The touchdown speed was 129 kt, noted as a little fast, and the vertical rate was fair at minus 278 fpm. The touchdown point was slightly off centreline by 3.6 m. The total landing distance measured 1,001 m, representing 31 % of the 3,189 m runway length.
Runway rollout alignment was very good, with the aircraft remaining on the centreline through the deceleration phase.
Reduce the touchdown speed toward the target VREF to minimise excess kinetic energy and refine flare timing to achieve a lower descent rate. Maintaining precise centreline tracking will further tighten the touchdown point alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values