Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 15 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 840 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 840 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 367 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, achieving a landing score of 91.8% is a commendable achievement. Let's break down the different phases of the landing and see areas where improvement can be made to achieve an even higher score.
During the Approach Phase, it's noted that the descent path was below the glideslope limit and the speed slightly above target. To improve in this phase, try to maintain a more consistent descent path and adjust the speed to remain within the target range. This will help ensure a smoother transition into the Landing Phase.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's great to see that the threshold height was good and there was a very good landing flare. This indicates proper control and coordination during the critical moment of touchdown. However, it's mentioned that the touchdown speed was a little above target. Aim to keep the speed within the specified range to enhance overall landing performance.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was good and the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone was on point. The touchdown position relative to the centreline could be improved slightly by aiming for a more centralized touchdown point.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off, with a deviation of 9.6 m from the centreline. Focus on maintaining a straight rollout and aim to improve alignment for a smoother taxiing experience.
Overall, this landing performance shows strong proficiency in many key areas, with room for refinement in others. Keep up the great work and continue to strive for excellence in all phases of the landing process. With continued practice and attention to detail, even higher scores can be achieved in future landings. Keep up the good work!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values