Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Apply small rudder corrections against a point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline during the roll.
What happened: The aircraft tracked 24 m off the runway centreline during the ground roll, and flights with this pattern usually carry extra bank, around 7.2°, into the first climb.
Watch for: Heading indicator: wings level, tracking the runway centreline
Arrival
Make small rudder corrections against a fixed point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline.
What happened: You drifted off the centreline on the approach.
Watch for: Runway centreline: tracked all the way to the threshold.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 14 stages, 12 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: centreline 7.1° off, against a 1° limit.
At the 500 ft gate: centreline 1.4° off, against a 1° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,483 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,483 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 395 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from CYYR Goose Bay Airport in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, the Phenom 300E aircraft began its journey with a taxiing period of 7 minutes, covering less than 1 nautical mile to reach the runway. The departure roll on runway 08 was initiated, with a takeoff distance of 2,106 meters, accounting for 63% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 118 knots, with a local temperature of 2°C and a wind of 9 knots at 330 degrees, resulting in a 9-knot crosswind and a 1-knot headwind.
As the aircraft climbed out of Goose Bay, it began its enroute climb, reaching an altitude of 41,008 feet above sea level in 14 minutes, covering a distance of 67 nautical miles. The climb started with an initial altitude of 1,160 feet above sea level, resulting in an increase of 39,848 feet. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, lasting 16 minutes and covering 471 nautical miles, 22 miles west of CCZ2 Rigolet Airport. The descent phase began 101 miles southwest of BGJH Qaqortoq Heliport in Greenland, with the aircraft descending from 40,993 feet to 732 feet above sea level in 28 minutes, covering 127 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 27 at BGJH Qaqortoq Heliport was initiated from the east, with a heading of 267.0 degrees at 1 nautical mile and 180 feet above ground level. The landing was successful, with a touchdown distance of 393 meters, accounting for 62% of the runway. The touchdown speed was 99 knots, and the touchdown rate was -36 feet per minute, indicating a perfect landing. However, the runway touchdown position was significantly misaligned by 22.7 meters from the centerline, and the runway rollout alignment was also misaligned by 21.2 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 912 meters, and the total flight distance was 669 nautical miles, consuming 860 kilograms of fuel in 70 minutes.
The final approach to runway 27 at BGJH Qaqortoq Heliport was initiated from the east, heading 267.0° at 1 nm and 180 ft above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height allowing for a controlled descent. The threshold speed was also well-managed, reaching 110 kt as expected. The aircraft touched down at a distance of 393 m, which was within acceptable limits, and at a speed of 99 kt, indicating a smooth touchdown. The touchdown rate of -36 fpm was perfect, demonstrating excellent control and precision.
However, the runway touchdown position was significantly misaligned by 22.7 m from the centreline, which may have been due to factors such as crosswind or pilot error. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 4 °C and a wind of 7 kt at 268°, may have contributed to the misalignment. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 kt, but the headwind of 6 kt may have affected the aircraft's alignment. Despite this, the total landing distance of 912 m was only 62% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing roll.
The runway rollout alignment was also misaligned by 21.2 m from the centreline, which may have been a result of the initial touchdown position. Nevertheless, the overall landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 85.9%. While there were some deviations from the ideal, the pilot demonstrated good control and precision throughout the approach and touchdown phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values