Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 5.2 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Make small rudder corrections against a fixed point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline.
What happened: You drifted off the centreline on the approach.
Watch for: Runway centreline: tracked all the way to the threshold.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: centreline 10.2° off, against a 1° limit.
At the 500 ft gate: centreline 7.4° off, against a 1° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,796 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 507 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from EGPE Inverness Airport, the Airbus A320 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. As the aircraft lined up on runway 23, it was met with local weather conditions of 11 °C and a wind of 10 kt at 169 °, resulting in a crosswind of 9 kt and a headwind of 5 kt. The departure roll commenced, and the aircraft accelerated down the 1,570-meter runway, using 87% of its length to reach liftoff speed of 165 kt.
As the aircraft climbed away from EGPE, it began its enroute climb 1 mile north west of Croy, Scotland, at an altitude of 1,011 ft asl. Over the course of 9 minutes, the aircraft ascended to 18,008 ft asl, an increase of 16,997 ft, while covering a distance of 38 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise phase followed, commencing 9 miles south east of Ullapool, Scotland, and lasting 29 minutes, during which the aircraft covered a distance of 206 nautical miles. The enroute descent phase began 36 miles south east of Sumba, Faroe Islands, and saw the aircraft descend from 18,009 ft asl to 577 ft asl, a decrease of 17,431 ft, in 18 minutes, covering a distance of 100 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 12 at EKVG Vágar Airport was initiated from the north west, with the aircraft heading 117.0 ° at 1 nautical mile and 317 ft agl. The landing was executed on the 1,795-meter runway, with a threshold speed well above the target at 153 kt. However, the touchdown speed of 146 kt was a little fast, and the touchdown rate was hard at -427 fpm. The touchdown point was 87 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.6 meters from the centreline. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 349 nautical miles, taking 66 minutes, and the aircraft used 3,082 kg of fuel.
The final approach to runway 12 at EKVG Vágar Airport from the north west was executed with a heading of 117.0° at 1 nm and 317 ft above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height achieved. However, the threshold speed was well above the target, reaching 153 kt, which may have been a result of the strong headwind of 29 kt.
As the aircraft touched down on the runway, the touchdown point was 87 m beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slight over-run. The touchdown speed of 146 kt was a little fast, and the touchdown rate was hard at -427 fpm, which may have been due to the aircraft's high speed at touchdown. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.6 m from the centreline, which could have been a result of the crosswind of 4 kt and the headwind of 29 kt.
The total landing distance of 977 m was 54% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing distance. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.8 m from the centreline, which may have been a result of the aircraft's high speed at touchdown and the crosswind. Overall, the landing performance scored 88.9%, indicating a good but not exceptional landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values