Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smooth aileron to roll the wings level in the first climb segment, holding bank angle near wings-level instead of letting it build to 1.9°.
What happened: The wings held 1.9° of bank through the first climb segment and had drifted to 1.4° by the second - this early wing-level drift usually carries through into a larger bank excursion later in the climb.
Watch for: Watch the attitude indicator's bank pointer and keep it at wings level throughout the climb.
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 39 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 39 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 39 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 25 stages, 23 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 300 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
The approach that landed joined below the 300 ft gate, after a go-around. The gate assessed on the earlier approach is not shown - it was not the landing's.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 6,814 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 6,814 ft of the 9,708 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 2,427 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Embraer E190 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Vnukovo International Airport (UUWW), taking approximately 1 minute and covering less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 06, with a takeoff distance of 3,946 feet, which was 34% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 145 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of Vnukovo, it encountered local weather conditions of 60°F temperature and 8-knot winds at 349°. The enroute climb started overhead Vnukovo, with the aircraft ascending from 1,727 feet above sea level to 36,595 feet, an increase of 34,868 feet in 21 minutes, covering 85 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 5 miles south-east of Kolchugino Airport (UBEL), lasting 1,252 minutes and covering 1,450 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its descent 22 miles south-east of Antibes, France, descending from 37,265 feet to 6,266 feet in 3 minutes, covering 35 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise resumed overhead Cipieres, France, lasting 7 minutes and covering 57 nautical miles. The aircraft then climbed from 6,436 feet to 12,285 feet in 2 minutes, covering 5 nautical miles, starting its ascent 3 miles west of Ribiers, France.
The enroute level cruise began again 3 miles west of Noyers-sur-Jabron, France, lasting 5 minutes and covering 28 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its descent 2 miles south of Moustiers-Sainte-Marie, France, descending from 12,541 feet to 5,644 feet in 3 minutes, covering 15 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise resumed overhead Ampus, France, lasting 20 minutes and covering 21 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its descent 2 miles south-east of Saint-Raphael, France, descending from 5,061 feet to 4,137 feet in 2 minutes, covering 7 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began again 3 miles south of Theoule-sur-Mer, France, lasting 2 minutes and covering 5 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its descent 2 miles south-east of Cannes, France, descending from 3,716 feet to 1,255 feet in 3 minutes, covering 7 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 04R at Nice-Côte d'Azur Airport (LFMN) was from the south-west, with a heading of 115.0° at 3 nautical miles and 1,221 feet above ground level. However, a go-around was initiated at 192 feet above ground level.
The aircraft then landed on runway 04R, with a touchdown point 1,035 feet beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 115 knots, which was fast, but the touchdown rate was excellent at -66 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 77°F temperature and 7-knot winds at 90°, with a crosswind of 5 knots and a headwind of 5 knots. The total landing distance was 6,521 feet, which was 67% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was also very good.
The taxiing from the runway to the parking area took approximately 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,722 nautical miles, taking 296 minutes, and the aircraft used 20,777 pounds of fuel.
The Embraer E190 aircraft successfully landed at LFMN Nice-Côte d'Azur Airport, achieving an overall score of 83.0%. The final approach to runway 04R was initiated from the southwest, heading 115.0° at a distance of 3 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,221 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down 1,035 feet beyond the designated touchdown zone, which is a significant deviation from the target. The touchdown speed of 115 knots was also higher than the recommended speed, indicating that the pilot may have been unable to slow down the aircraft sufficiently before touchdown. However, the touchdown rate of -66 feet per minute (fpm) was excellent, demonstrating good control and stability during the landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 77°F and a gentle wind of 7 knots at 90°. The crosswind and headwind components were both 5 knots, which is relatively minimal and should not have significantly impacted the landing. The runway length of 9,708 feet was more than sufficient to accommodate the aircraft's landing distance of 6,521 feet, which accounted for 67% of the runway.
The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot maintained a stable and aligned approach to the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also excellent, demonstrating good control and stability during the rollout phase. Overall, while there were some deviations from the target, the landing was successful, and the pilot demonstrated good control and stability throughout the approach and landing phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values