Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Roll the wings level with aileron and hold bank within limits as you establish the climb.
What happened: Bank increased to 2.3° during the initial climb, and wings stayed over-banked at 5.5° into the next climb segment.
Watch for: Attitude indicator bank angle, aiming to keep it near wings-level
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 16 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: seven checks where the approach path is 300 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
At the 300 ft gate: off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 2,058 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the full 2,058 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 504 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departure from Innsbruck Airport's runway 08 was smooth, with the Cessna 208B accelerating to liftoff speed of 80 kt in a distance of 1,634 ft, which accounted for 26% of the available runway. The aircraft lifted off into a local temperature of 61 °F and a gentle tailwind of 1 kt, with winds blowing at 1 kt from 268 °.
As the aircraft climbed out of Innsbruck, it transitioned into a steady enroute climb, reaching an altitude of 9,040 ft asl in 7 minutes, covering a distance of 17 nm. The climb was characterized by a steady increase in altitude, with the aircraft reaching a maximum rate of climb not specified in the report. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, maintaining an altitude of 9,040 ft asl for 3 minutes while covering a distance of 9 nm. The cruise phase was followed by a descent, initiated 3 miles north of Lermoos, during which the aircraft descended from 9,348 ft asl to 5,100 ft asl in 3 minutes, covering a distance of 8 nm.
The final approach to Reutte-Höfen Airfield's runway 22 was conducted from the north-east, with the aircraft aligning with the runway at 3 nm and 2,268 ft agl. The approach was characterized by a threshold speed of 52 kt, which was well below the target speed, necessitating caution to avoid stalling. The aircraft touched down on the runway at a speed of 42 kt, with a touchdown distance of 495 ft and a firm touchdown rate of -321 fpm. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the aircraft rolled out to a stop in a distance of 906 ft, accounting for 44% of the available runway. The total flight distance was 43 nm, and the aircraft used 6 lbs of fuel, with a total flight time of 19 minutes.
The aircraft touched down on runway 22 at LOIR Reutte-Höfen Airfield with a firm touchdown rate of -321 fpm, indicating a controlled descent. The touchdown speed of 42 kt was well within the target range, demonstrating good control and management of the aircraft's energy state. The touchdown distance of 495 ft was also satisfactory, considering the available runway length of 2,058 ft.
The approach quality was good, with a threshold height that was well within the acceptable range. The threshold speed of 52 kt was below the target, necessitating caution to avoid stalling the aircraft. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway centerline. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 59 °F and a light headwind of 1 kt, contributed to a stable and predictable approach.
The rollout phase was also executed well, with the aircraft maintaining perfect centerline alignment. The total landing distance of 906 ft, which accounted for 44% of the available runway length, was within acceptable limits. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 82.3% reflecting the good control and management of the aircraft's energy state, as well as the stable approach and rollout phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values