Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 7,529 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 1,439 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 87.3% indicates that there were some areas that could be improved upon, but it also shows that there were several aspects of the landing that were executed well.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that there was a poor descent path above the glideslope limit. This indicates that the descent was not well controlled and may have resulted in a slightly off-target approach. Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is mentioned that the threshold height was well above the target, which could have affected the precision of the landing. Additionally, the landing flare was fair and there was poor bank angle stability during landing. These factors may have contributed to a slightly rough touchdown.
However, there are several positive aspects to highlight as well. In the Touchdown Phase, it is mentioned that the touchdown rate was good, the speed was on target, and the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone. These factors show good control and precision during this critical phase of the landing. Furthermore, the runway touchdown position was 28 ft from the centerline, which indicates a relatively accurate touchdown.
Moving on to the Rollout Phase, it is noted that the runway alignment was 31 ft from the centerline. While this could be improved upon, it is important to note that the aircraft successfully landed and was able to safely come to a stop.
Overall, while there were some areas that could be improved upon such as descent path control, threshold height, and runway alignment, there were also several positive aspects to the landing such as touchdown rate, speed control, and touchdown zone accuracy. By focusing on these strengths and working on improving the areas of weakness, the next landing can be even better. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for improvement in all aspects of aircraft landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values