Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow down before tight turns
Twenty knots on a monitor produces the visual sensation of about ten. The advice to "taxi at a walking pace" cannot fix this, because your sense of walking pace is exactly the thing that's broken. Put the groundspeed readout in your scan and obey it for the next fifty flights, the way a student pilot leans on the airspeed indicator before learning to read attitude.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 5,989 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,989 ft of the 7,641 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 2,245 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 88.6% is a fairly decent result, with room for improvement in certain areas.
Starting with the Approach Phase, the descent path being below the glideslope limit indicates that there is a need to ensure better vertical alignment during descent. Additionally, the slightly above target speed suggests a need for more precise speed management during this phase.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is commendable that the threshold height was good. However, the very poor landing flare suggests that there may have been issues with the execution of the landing technique. This is an area that could benefit from further practice and refinement.
In the Touchdown Phase, the good touchdown rate and on-target speed are positive points. However, the touchdown point being 888 ft beyond the touchdown zone indicates an overshooting of the optimal landing spot. Additionally, the runway touchdown position being 38 ft from the centerline suggests that there may have been some lateral misalignment during touchdown.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 40 ft from the centerline indicates a need for improved lateral control during rollout.
Overall, while there are areas that require improvement, it is important to recognize the positive aspects of the landing score as well. With focused practice and attention to detail in the areas identified, there is great potential for achieving even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in every phase of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values