Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 27 stages, 25 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,219 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,219 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 523 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
While the aircraft landing score of 73.8% may seem disappointing at first, it's important to focus on the positives and areas for improvement in each phase of the landing process.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it's clear that there were some issues with descent path and heading alignment. However, the fact that the speed was only slightly below target shows that there is room for improvement but the overall performance was not severely lacking.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's notable that the threshold height was above target and the landing flare was very poor. These are areas that can definitely be worked on and improved upon in future landings.
In the Touchdown Phase, there were some positives to take away. The touchdown rate was smooth and the speed was on target, which are important factors in ensuring a safe landing. However, the touchdown point being 84 m beyond the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 2.5 m from the centerline are areas that need attention in terms of accuracy and precision.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 7.0 m from the centerline is another aspect that can be improved upon in order to ensure a smooth and efficient landing process.
Overall, while there may be some areas that need improvement, it's important to recognize the strengths in each phase of the landing process. With focused practice and attention to detail, the aircraft landing score can certainly be improved in future landings. Keep up the hard work and dedication to continuous improvement – progress is always possible with perseverance and determination.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values