Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,661 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,661 m of the 3,594 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 647 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft, an Airbus A320, taxiing from the parking area to the runway at LFH2 Bale Mulhouse. This process took 15 minutes and covered a distance of 4 nautical miles. Once at the runway, the aircraft took off from runway 15, with a takeoff distance of 1,494 meters, which accounted for 39% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 148 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of takeoff were characterized by a temperature of 6 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 3 knots at a direction of 259 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 knots and a tailwind of 1 knot. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, which started overhead Hesingue in the Grand Est region of France. The climb took the aircraft from an altitude of 1,948 feet above sea level to 36,930 feet above sea level, an increase of 34,982 feet, in 22 minutes and covering a distance of 104 nautical miles.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise, which started 2 miles north of Waiblingen in the Baden-Wuerttemberg region of Germany. This phase of the flight lasted for 69 minutes and covered a distance of 547 nautical miles. The enroute descent then began 2 miles west of Marstrand in the Vaestra Goetaland County of Sweden. The descent took the aircraft from an altitude of 36,778 feet above sea level to 1,937 feet above sea level, a decrease of 34,841 feet, in 27 minutes and covering a distance of 134 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 01L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, was made from the south, with a heading of 16.0 degrees at an altitude of 1,256 feet above ground level and 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on runway 01L, which had a length of 3,594 meters. The threshold height at 66 feet above ground level was above the target, but the threshold speed was good at 128 knots. The touchdown point was 219 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 120 knots, which was good, and a touchdown rate of -183 feet per minute, which was also good. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -3 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 2 knots at a direction of 14 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 0 knots and a headwind of 2 knots. The total landing distance was 1,568 meters, which accounted for 44% of the runway. However, the runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 16.7 meters from the centerline. The taxiing to the parking area from the runway took 6 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 797 nautical miles, which was covered in 132 minutes, and the aircraft used 4,184 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed on runway 01L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 85.2%. The aircraft approached the runway from the south, heading 16.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,256 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with a good threshold speed of 128 knots, which is within the acceptable range.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed 219 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is slightly off-target. However, the touchdown speed of 120 knots was good, and the touchdown rate of -183 feet per minute (fpm) was also within the acceptable range. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway during the landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -3°C and a wind speed of 2 knots from a direction of 14°. The crosswind component was negligible, with a headwind of 2 knots. These conditions were favorable for the landing, and the aircraft was able to maintain a stable approach.
The total landing distance of 1,568 meters was 44% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. However, the runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 16.7 meters from the centerline, indicating that the aircraft deviated slightly from the intended path during the rollout phase. Despite this, the landing was considered successful, with a score of 85.2%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values