Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 24 stages, 22 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 152 m above the runway. The 305 m gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,322 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,322 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 877 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
First of all, congratulations on achieving an aircraft landing score of 80.8%! It's clear that there are some areas for improvement, but overall you should feel proud of your performance.
Let's start by breaking down each phase of the landing process. In the Approach Phase, it's noted that there was a poor descent path above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly above target. This could suggest a need for better speed and altitude management during the approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, there were a couple of areas that could be improved. The threshold height was above target, indicating the need for better altitude control during the final moments before touchdown. Additionally, the landing flare was noted as very poor. This is an essential part of the landing process as it helps to ensure a smooth touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, there were both positives and areas for improvement. The touchdown rate was excellent, which is great to see. However, the speed was a little above target and the touchdown point was very long, using more than 50% of the available runway. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was 2.2 meters from the centerline, which could be improved with better alignment during touchdown.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was noted as very good. This is a positive sign that you were able to maintain control and alignment during the rollout after touchdown.
Overall, I would recommend focusing on improving your altitude and speed management during the approach and landing phases. Working on your landing flare and touchdown point could also help to improve your overall score. Keep practicing and paying attention to these areas, and I'm confident you'll see improvement in your future landings. Great job on your current score, and keep up the good work!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values