Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 8,011 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 1,335 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, landing an aircraft is a complex and challenging task that requires precision and skill. While the landing score of 88.5% is a good start, there are areas that can be improved upon to ensure even better performance in the future.
Firstly, the Approach Phase showed a poor descent path above the glideslope limit. Maintaining the correct descent path is crucial for a safe and smooth landing. It is important to follow the glideslope guidance closely to ensure a stable descent towards the runway.
In the Landing Phase, the threshold height was well above the target and the landing flare was very poor. The threshold height plays a key role in the accuracy of the landing, and a poor flare can result in a hard or bouncing touchdown. Focusing on improving these aspects of the landing approach can lead to a more controlled and precise touchdown.
On a positive note, the Touchdown Phase showed some areas of improvement. The touchdown rate was good and the speed was on target, indicating good control during the final moments before touchdown. Additionally, the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 13 ft from the centerline are positive indicators of precision during the landing.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was 12 ft from the centerline. While this shows some room for improvement in maintaining runway alignment, it is still a commendable effort to come close to the centerline.
Overall, with some adjustments and practice in key areas such as descent path, threshold height, landing flare, and runway alignment, there is great potential to further improve the aircraft landing score. Keep up the hard work and dedication to honing your skills, and you will undoubtedly see even better results in future landings. Remember, continuous learning and improvement are essential for mastering the art of aviation. Keep pushing yourself to strive for excellence!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values