Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on final to bleed speed back to 135 kt before crossing the threshold.
What happened: You crossed the threshold at 149 kt, 14 kt above the 135 kt target.
Watch for: Airspeed, targeting 135 kt at the threshold.
See Arrival Landing
There are several things that can go wrong during the flare, carrying too much speed over the threshold, starting the flare at the wrong height and inconsistent flight control inputs, all contribute to a poor flare resulting in a hard touchdown or a float down the runway.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,699 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,699 ft of the 10,144 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 1,596 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Naples International Airport (LIRN), the Airbus A320 initiated its takeoff roll on runway 06, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 152 kt after covering 3,741 ft, which represented 51% of the runway length. The aircraft then transitioned into a steady climb, reaching an altitude of 36,007 ft after ascending 34,827 ft in 21 minutes, while covering a distance of 128 nm. This enroute climb phase commenced approximately 1 mile south east of Casoria, Campania, Italy.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, maintaining an altitude of 36,007 ft for 89 minutes as it covered a distance of 621 nm. This phase began approximately 4 miles north west of Antrodoco, Lazio, Italy. The aircraft then initiated a descent, reducing its altitude from 36,003 ft to 2,913 ft in 16 minutes, while covering a distance of 90 nm. This descent phase started approximately 2 miles north west of Lehrte, Lower Saxony, Germany. The aircraft subsequently entered a brief level cruise phase, lasting 2 minutes and covering 5 nm, before commencing another descent phase from 2,919 ft to 1,355 ft in 2 minutes, while covering a distance of 5 nm. This final descent phase began overhead Jersbek, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.
The Airbus A320 then initiated its final approach to runway 23 at Hamburg Helmut Schmidt Airport (EDDH), aligning with the runway from the north east at a heading of 230.0°. The aircraft touched down 255 ft beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 142 kt and a touchdown rate of -280 fpm. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the runway rollout alignment was also satisfactory. The total landing distance was 5,458 ft, representing 54% of the runway length. Following touchdown, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, covering a distance of 1 nm in 5 minutes. The total flight distance was 857 nm, with a flight time of 138 minutes and a fuel consumption of 11,959 lbs.
The final approach to runway 23 at EDDH Hamburg Helmut Schmidt Airport was conducted from the north east, heading 230.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,297 feet above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height observed. However, the threshold speed was well above the target, reaching 150 knots, which may indicate a slight over-control by the pilot.
The aircraft touched down 255 feet beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 142 knots, which was faster than the target. The touchdown rate of -280 feet per minute was fair, indicating a moderate deceleration. Notably, the runway touchdown alignment was perfect, demonstrating precise control by the pilot. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 63°F and a light headwind of 1 knot, contributed to a relatively smooth landing.
The total landing distance of 5,458 feet was 54% of the runway length, indicating a moderate use of the available runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, showcasing the pilot's ability to maintain control during the critical phase of the landing. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 98.3%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values