Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Hold the aim point and wait for the speed to bleed before raising the nose, starting the flare within the normal band instead of 95 ft.
What happened: The flare began at 95 ft, 50 ft earlier than the normal band.
Watch for: Radio altimeter: start the flare within the normal flare band
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 28 stages, 26 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 2,148 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,148 m of the 3,352 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 724 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in question was operated by a Boeing 777F aircraft. The aircraft began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The departure roll took place on runway 25C at Hong Kong International Airport (VHHH), with the aircraft taking off at a speed of 182 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 32 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 3 knots from a direction of 220 degrees. The crosswind component was 2 knots, while the headwind component was 3 knots. The aircraft's takeoff distance was 1,940 meters, which accounted for 56% of the runway length.
After takeoff, the aircraft began its enroute climb, which started 2 miles west of Hong Kong International Airport. The climb took place from an altitude of 1,012 feet above sea level to 25,134 feet above sea level, an increase of 24,122 feet in 17 minutes. The aircraft covered a distance of 53 nautical miles during this phase of the flight.
The enroute level cruise phase began 7 miles southwest of Licheng, China, and lasted for 69 minutes. During this time, the aircraft covered a distance of 557 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another enroute climb, this time from 25,412 feet to 27,237 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,826 feet in 3 minutes. The aircraft covered a distance of 30 nautical miles during this phase.
The enroute level cruise phase resumed 12 miles east of Yibin, China, and lasted for 32 minutes. The aircraft covered a distance of 276 nautical miles during this time. The aircraft then began another enroute climb, this time from 27,421 feet to 29,908 feet above sea level, an increase of 2,487 feet in 3 minutes. The aircraft covered a distance of 29 nautical miles during this phase.
The enroute level cruise phase resumed 46 miles north of Jiuzhai Huanglong Airport, China, and lasted for 334 minutes. The aircraft covered a distance of 2,593 nautical miles during this time. The aircraft then began another enroute climb, this time from 30,126 feet to 31,942 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,816 feet in 2 minutes. The aircraft covered a distance of 13 nautical miles during this phase.
The enroute level cruise phase resumed 5 miles north of Altiagac, Azerbaijan, and lasted for 82 minutes. The aircraft covered a distance of 646 nautical miles during this time. The aircraft then began another enroute climb, this time from 31,897 feet to 33,935 feet above sea level, an increase of 2,037 feet in 2 minutes. The aircraft covered a distance of 13 nautical miles during this phase.
The enroute level cruise phase resumed 8 miles south of Turkeli, Turkey, and lasted for 69 minutes. The aircraft covered a distance of 545 nautical miles during this time. The aircraft then began another enroute climb, this time from 33,934 feet to 35,411 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,477 feet in 2 minutes. The aircraft covered a distance of 13 nautical miles during this phase.
The enroute level cruise phase resumed 2 miles west of Valisoara, Romania, and lasted for 87 minutes. The aircraft covered a distance of 676 nautical miles during this time. The aircraft then began its descent, which started 1 mile west of Beelen Airfield, Germany. The descent took place from an altitude of 36,240 feet above sea level to
The Boeing 777F aircraft successfully landed at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, achieving a score of 91.4%. The final approach to runway 27 was conducted from the east, with a heading of 267.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,267 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway, with the touchdown point located 313 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone. The touchdown speed of 144 knots was within the acceptable range, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. However, the touchdown rate of -259 feet per minute (fpm) was considered fair, suggesting that the aircraft could have been brought down more gently.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 21°C and a wind speed of 2 knots from a direction of 0°. This resulted in a negligible crosswind and headwind, making the landing process even smoother. The runway length of 3,352 meters was more than sufficient to accommodate the aircraft's landing distance of 2,073 meters, which accounted for 62% of the available runway.
The runway touchdown alignment was rated as very good, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway centerline at the moment of touchdown. Similarly, the runway rollout alignment was also very good, suggesting that the aircraft maintained its alignment with the runway centerline during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score and demonstrating a high level of proficiency in landing operations.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values