Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Track the centreline
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: centreline 2.4° off, against a 1° limit.
At the 500 ft gate: centreline 4.8° off, against a 1° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,804 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 483 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from UKKK Ihor Sikorsky Kyiv International Airport (Zhuliany), the Boeing 737-800 initiated its takeoff roll on runway 26. The aircraft accelerated to a liftoff speed of 159 kt, clearing the runway threshold at 1,253 m, which represented 59% of the available runway length. Local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 16 °C, with a gentle headwind of 1 kt and a crosswind of 6 kt.
As the aircraft climbed away from Kyiv, it transitioned into an enroute climb phase, ascending from 1,537 ft to 24,007 ft over the course of 9 minutes and covering 51 nm. This initial climb phase was followed by a brief level cruise segment, lasting 2 minutes and covering 11 nm, as the aircraft flew over Myronivka. The crew then initiated a second climb phase, this time from 23,992 ft to 25,733 ft, as they approached the Cherkasy Oblast region. Following a 16-minute level cruise segment over Vilshana, the aircraft began its descent towards Odessa International Airport, UKOO. The descent phase, which spanned 21 minutes and covered 108 nm, brought the aircraft from 25,980 ft to 1,514 ft.
As the Boeing 737-800 approached runway 34 at UKOO, it initiated a final approach from the south, aligning itself with the runway at 4 nm and 1,337 ft above ground level. The aircraft touched down on the runway at a speed of 141 kt, with a touchdown distance of 293 m. Although the touchdown speed was slightly above the target, the touchdown rate was fair at -257 fpm. However, the runway touchdown position was excessively misaligned by 246.6 m from the centreline, and the runway rollout alignment was also misaligned by 249.2 m. The total landing distance was 1,078 m, representing 38% of the available runway length. Following a short taxiing period, the aircraft arrived at the parking area, having completed a total flight distance of 297 nm and consuming 2,516 kg of fuel over a duration of 61 minutes.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 34 at UKOO Odessa International Airport with a slightly above-target threshold speed of 144 kt. The approach quality was good, with a threshold height that met expectations. However, the touchdown speed of 141 kt was a little fast, resulting in a fair touchdown rate of -257 fpm. The touchdown distance of 293 m was good, but the aircraft's centreline alignment was excessively misaligned by 246.6 m from the runway centreline.
As the aircraft rolled out, it continued to deviate from the centreline, with an excessive misalignment of 249.2 m. The total landing distance of 1,078 m was 38% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 15 °C and a light wind of 2 kt at 194 °, did not pose any significant challenges to the landing. The crosswind and tailwind components were minimal, at 1 kt each.
Overall, the landing performance scored 77.1%, reflecting a good approach quality and touchdown distance, but some issues with touchdown speed and centreline alignment. The excessive misalignment during rollout was a notable concern, highlighting the need for further improvement in the aircraft's control and navigation during the final stages of the landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values