Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on approach to be at 141 kt by the stabilisation gate, not just by the threshold.
What happened: The approach was too fast at the stabilisation gate, crossing the threshold at 141 kt against a VREF of 141 kt.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator against 141 kt at the stabilisation gate.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed 45 kt FAST on the reference speed of 141 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,730 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 397 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The Boeing 737-800 taxied from the parking area to runway 21 at ESGG Göteborg Landvetter Airport in 4 minutes, covering approximately 1 nm.
During the departure roll on runway 21, the aircraft accelerated to a liftoff speed of 152 kt and became airborne after a takeoff distance of 1,290 m, which represented 39 % of the runway; ambient conditions were 17 °C with a wind of 6 kt from 159°, including a 4 kt cross-wind and a 4 kt head-wind.
Climb commenced about 1 mile southwest of ESGG, with the airplane rising from 1,440 ft asl to 38,619 ft asl-a gain of 37,179 ft-over 32 minutes while traversing 253 nm.
Level cruise began 45 miles west of Pavilosta in Latvia and continued for 93 minutes, during which the flight covered 846 nm.
Descent was initiated 4 miles north of Lyskovo, Russia, descending from 39,000 ft asl to 1,720 ft asl, a loss of 37,280 ft, in 22 minutes and over a distance of 170 nm.
The final approach to runway 29 at UWKD Kazan International Airport was flown from the southeast on a heading of 304.0° at 4 nm and 1,327 ft agl; local weather reported 21 °C with a 3 kt wind from 296°, no cross-wind and a 3 kt head-wind.
Landing on runway 29 was achieved with a threshold speed of 141 kt; touchdown occurred 398 m down the runway at 133 kt, with a vertical speed of minus 241 fpm and perfect runway alignment, while the runway length measured 3,730 m.
The aircraft rolled out a total landing distance of 1,017 m, representing 27 % of the runway, and the rollout alignment was judged very good.
After exiting the runway, the airplane taxied to the parking area in 1 minute, covering less than 1 nm.
In total, the flight covered 1,276 nm, took 154 minutes, and consumed 7,407 kg of fuel.
The Boeing 737-800 established a final approach to runway 29 at UWKD Kazan International Airport from the south-east, tracking a heading of 304.0 ° at 4 nm and 1,327 ft agl. The overall landing received a score of 99.3 %.
At threshold the aircraft presented a good threshold height and a good threshold speed of 141 kt. Ambient conditions were 21 °C with wind 3 kt from 296 °, giving a headwind component of 3 kt and zero crosswind.
Touchdown occurred 398 m down the runway; the touchdown speed was 133 kt, noted as a little fast, and the vertical rate was fair at minus 241 fpm. Runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The total landing distance measured 1,017 m, representing 27 % of the 3,730 m runway, and rollout alignment was very good.
To refine the already high score, a slight reduction in touchdown speed would bring the aircraft closer to the target VREF, and a smoother flare could lower the descent rate toward a gentler touchdown. These adjustments will further tighten the margin of safety while preserving the excellent alignment achieved.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values