Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 9.9 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,507 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 723 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with taxying from the parking to the runway, which took 7 minutes and covered a distance of approximately 1 nautical mile. This marked the aircraft turning point to prepare for departure.
As the Airbus A320 took to the skies from runway 24 at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, it made a smooth departure roll. The aircraft lifted off the ground at 165 knots and utilized 1,178 meters of runway, or 37% of the available length. Local weather conditions at the time of departure included a temperature of 24 degrees Celsius and wind speeds of 14 knots, blowing from a direction of 250 degrees.
As the aircraft climbed away from EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, it started its enroute climb approximately 1 mile northwest of Aalsmeerderbrug, a town located in the province of North Holland. During this climb phase, the aircraft rose from an altitude of 1,041 feet above sea level (asl) to a cruising altitude of 37,144 feet asl, an increase of approximately 36,103 feet. This climb took 29 minutes and covered a distance of 208 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, during which it flew for 51 minutes over a distance of 439 nautical miles. The cruise level began approximately 1 mile south of Gross Oesingen, a town in the state of Lower Saxony.
As the flight continued, it descended from its cruising altitude of 36,776 feet asl to an altitude of 3,770 feet asl in the vicinity of Kowale Oleckie, a town in the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship of Poland. This descent took 17 minutes and covered a distance of 111 nautical miles.
The aircraft then experienced another climb phase, this time taking off from an altitude of 3,765 feet asl to 5,494 feet asl in just 3 minutes, while covering a distance of 15 nautical miles. This climb occurred while the aircraft was overhead Nemencine, a town in the Vilnius County of Lithuania.
Following this climb, the aircraft began another descent, this time from an altitude of 5,474 feet asl to 3,326 feet asl in just 2 minutes, while covering a distance of 7 nautical miles. This descent occurred while the aircraft was 2 miles east of Baltoji Voke, a town in the Vilnius County of Lithuania.
The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase for a shorter duration, flying for 10 minutes over a distance of 14 nautical miles. This cruise level started approximately 4 miles northeast of the Paluknys Heli Base in Lithuania.
As the flight progressed, the aircraft began its final approach to runway 19 at Vilnius International Airport. The approach began from the north and took place at a heading of 202.0 degrees, approximately 4 nautical miles from the runway threshold. At an altitude of 1,303 feet above ground level (agl), the aircraft descended towards the runway and touched down at a point 308 meters beyond the touchdown zone.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft had a speed of 124 knots, which was classified as good. The touchdown rate, however, was fair at -284 feet per minute. The aircraft's runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with no issues reported. Local weather conditions at the time of landing included a temperature of 20 degrees Celsius and wind speeds of 7 knots, blowing from a direction of 140 degrees.
Following the successful landing, the aircraft came to a stop after a total landing distance of 1,395 meters or 56% of the available runway length. Runway rollout alignment was very good. Taxiing to the parking from the runway took just 3 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile, marking the end of the
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at Vilnius International Airport, achieving a high overall score of 94.0%. The aircraft's approach to runway 19 from the north was executed at a heading of 202.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,303 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon touching down on the runway, the aircraft performed well, with a touchdown speed of 124 knots being within the desired range. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 136 knots. The touchdown point was 308 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, indicating that the aircraft landed slightly further down the runway than intended.
Despite the slightly higher threshold speed and longer touchdown distance, the overall touchdown rate was fair at -284 feet per minute (fpm). This suggests that the aircraft descended at a moderate rate, allowing for a relatively smooth landing. The perfect runway touchdown alignment demonstrates that the pilots maintained excellent control during the approach and landing phases.
The local weather at the time of the landing was characterized by a temperature of 20°C and moderate winds of 7 knots blowing at 140°. The wind conditions resulted in a 6-knot crosswind and a 3-knot headwind. Although these winds slightly affected the aircraft's flight path, the pilots successfully managed to align the aircraft with the runway, achieving very good runway rollout alignment.
In terms of overall performance, the aircraft demonstrated good control and stability during the landing, with 56% of the runway being utilized. The total landing distance of 1,395 meters indicates a relatively short landing distance, which is within acceptable limits. Overall, this landing was deemed successful, despite a few minor deviations from the target parameters.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values