Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,609 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,609 m of the 3,797 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 700 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Great job on achieving a 93.4% landing score! Your approach phase was solid with excellent glideslope alignment, showcasing your precision and attention to detail. However, there are some areas where improvement can be made in the landing and rollout phases.
During the landing phase, your threshold height was good, but the landing flare could use some work. Making sure to properly flare before touchdown will help achieve a smoother landing and reduce the risk of a hard landing.
Despite the slight flaw in the landing flare, your touchdown phase was commendable. Your touchdown rate was smooth, and you had the right speed upon touchdown. However, it's worth noting that the touchdown point being 283m beyond the touchdown zone indicates room for improvement in judgment and timing.
Additionally, the runway touchdown position being 5.5m from the centerline suggests the need for better alignment during touchdown. Paying closer attention to runway alignment will enhance the overall landing performance.
Lastly, the rollout phase had good runway alignment, but there is still room for improvement as it was slightly off center at 5.4m from the centerline. Ensuring precision in runway alignment will help enhance the overall effectiveness of the landing maneuver.
Overall, you have shown great skill and potential in your landing abilities. By focusing on areas such as the landing flare, touchdown point judgment, and runway alignment, you can further improve and achieve even higher landing scores in the future. Keep up the excellent work and continue striving for perfection in each phase of the landing process. Your dedication and commitment to improvement will surely lead to even greater success in your future landings. Great job!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values