Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 26 ft off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 6,203 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 1,372 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A320 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Gibraltar Airport, taking approximately 1 minute to cover less than 1 nautical mile. The departure roll took place on runway 27, with the aircraft taking off after covering 70% of the 3,509-foot runway. The liftoff speed was 144 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time were characterized by a temperature of 69°F and a wind speed of 3 knots at 200°.
As the aircraft climbed away from Gibraltar, it began its enroute climb 1 mile west of the airport, rising from an altitude of 1,040 feet above sea level to 35,882 feet above sea level. This climb, which covered a distance of 119 nautical miles, took 19 minutes to complete. The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, which started 2 miles east of Jamilena in Andalusia, Spain, and lasted for 101 minutes. During this time, the aircraft covered a distance of 805 nautical miles.
The enroute descent phase began 3 miles north of Amden in Kanton St. Gallen, Switzerland, and saw the aircraft descend from an altitude of 35,929 feet above sea level to 3,427 feet above sea level. This descent, which covered a distance of 94 nautical miles, took 24 minutes to complete. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 26 at Innsbruck Airport, flying from the east at a heading of 256.0° and at an altitude of 1,511 feet above ground level.
The landing took place on runway 26, which had a length of 6,203 feet. The local weather conditions at the time were characterized by a temperature of 45°F and a wind speed of 3 knots at 290°. The aircraft touched down at a speed of 129 knots, which was a little fast, and had a touchdown rate of -242 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the runway rollout alignment was perfect.
The total landing distance was 4,706 feet, which accounted for 76% of the runway length. The aircraft then taxied to the parking area, taking approximately 3 minutes to cover less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,025 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 156 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 12,874 pounds of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at Innsbruck Airport (LOWI) on runway 26, achieving a high score of 98.5%. The aircraft approached the runway from the east, heading 256.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,511 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot maintained a good threshold height, which is a critical aspect of a safe landing.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's threshold speed was within the acceptable range at 134 knots. However, the touchdown speed of 129 knots was slightly faster than desired, which may have resulted in a slightly higher touchdown rate. The touchdown rate of -242 feet per minute (fpm) was considered fair, indicating that the aircraft touched down with a moderate amount of deceleration.
The landing distance of 4,706 feet was 76% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. This suggests that the pilot made a smooth and controlled approach, and the aircraft responded well to the controls. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was aligned with the runway centerline at the moment of touchdown.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 45°F and a gentle headwind of 3 knots. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 knot, which made the landing even more challenging. The pilot's ability to handle the aircraft in these conditions was impressive, and the result was a safe and successful landing.
The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the pilot maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout phase and brought it to a stop in a straight line. Overall, the landing was a testament to the pilot's skill and experience, as well as the aircraft's performance and handling characteristics.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values