Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 2,102 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,102 m of the 3,100 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 898 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 88.2% is a great achievement, but there are definitely areas where improvements can be made to further enhance your skills as a pilot.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it's commendable that you had good glideslope alignment. This indicates that you had a steady and controlled descent towards the runway, which is crucial for a successful landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's evident that there are some areas that need improvement. The fact that the threshold height was above target suggests that you could work on your approach to ensure a smoother touchdown. Additionally, the poor landing flare indicates that you may need to focus on your technique when it comes to the final moments before touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, it's positive to note that your touchdown rate was fair and your speed was on target. However, the fact that the touchdown point was significantly beyond the touchdown zone is a point of concern. This could potentially lead to safety issues and it's something that you should aim to rectify in future landings. Similarly, the runway touchdown position being off centerline indicates that you may need to work on your alignment during touchdown.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 5.1 m off centerline is another area that could use improvement. Ensuring that you maintain a straight and centered rollout will not only enhance the overall landing but also contribute to a smoother taxiing experience.
In conclusion, while your aircraft landing score of 88.2% is a great start, there are clear opportunities for improvement in various phases of the landing process. With some focused practice and attention to detail, you have the potential to further refine your skills and achieve even higher scores in the future. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in your flying abilities.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values