Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 27 stages, 25 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,193 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,193 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 110 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 88.6% is a solid reflection of the pilot's performance during the various phases of the landing process.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is clear that there were some issues with unstable glideslope alignment and slightly below target speed. It is important to ensure that these factors are closely monitored and adjusted in order to maintain a stable approach. However, this is an area that can easily be improved with practice and attention to detail.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is commendable that the pilot had a good threshold height and very good landing flare. These are crucial aspects of a successful landing and indicate a strong understanding of proper landing techniques. It is noted that there was poor bank angle stability during landing, which is an area that may require further focus and practice to improve.
In the Touchdown Phase, there were both positive and negative points to consider. The hard touchdown rate is something that should be addressed, as a smoother touchdown is typically preferred for passenger comfort and aircraft maintenance purposes. However, it is encouraging to see that the speed was on target and the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone was appropriate. Additionally, the runway touchdown position being only 11.1 m from the centerline is a good indication of the pilot's ability to accurately land the aircraft.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 14.7 m from the centerline is an area that may need some improvement. It is crucial to maintain proper alignment during rollout in order to ensure a safe and smooth landing.
Overall, with continued practice and attention to detail, the pilot should be able to address the areas that need improvement and achieve even higher landing scores in the future. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in all aspects of aircraft landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values