Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,738 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 617 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 90.0% indicates a strong performance during most phases of the landing process. The Approach Phase stood out with excellent glideslope alignment, showing skilled control and precision in descending towards the runway. This is a fantastic achievement and sets a high standard for future landings.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is commendable that the threshold height and landing flare were executed well. These factors play a crucial role in ensuring a smooth and safe touchdown. However, there is room for improvement in the landing heading, as it was rated as poor. Paying closer attention to alignment during the final approach can help in achieving a more precise landing heading in the future.
During the Touchdown Phase, the fair touchdown rate and slightly above target speed indicate a decent landing. However, the touchdown point being 197m beyond the touchdown zone suggests that adjustments can be made to improve accuracy and consistency in landing within the designated area. Similarly, the runway touchdown position being 15.6m off from the centerline highlights the need for better alignment and control during this phase.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 15.8m from the centerline indicates some room for improvement in maintaining a straight path upon touchdown. This can be worked on through better coordination and control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, while the landing score of 90.0% is a strong result, there are specific areas highlighted for improvement. By focusing on enhancing landing heading, touchdown accuracy, and runway alignment, future landings can be even more precise and efficient. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in all phases of aircraft landing. You have shown great potential, and with dedication and practice, you can further improve your skills and performance in the future.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values