Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Use small rudder inputs against a point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline during rollout.
What happened: During the rollout the aircraft drifted 8 m off the centreline.
Watch for: Runway centreline marks: hold the aircraft tracking straight down the centreline through rollout
See Arrival Rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed 6 kt SLOW on the reference speed of 137 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,635 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,635 m of the 4,065 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 487 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Aircraft departed from Genoa Cristoforo Colombo Airport, runway 28, with a takeoff distance of 1,621 meters, accounting for 59% of the runway. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 22 °C, with a wind speed of 15 kt at 240°, resulting in a crosswind of 11 kt and a headwind of 10 kt. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 152 kt, initiating its enroute climb.
The climb phase commenced overhead Genova, with the aircraft ascending from 963 ft to 36,010 ft in 27 minutes, covering a distance of 140 nm. The climb rate was steady, with the aircraft maintaining a consistent ascent throughout the phase. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise, initially at 36,010 ft, before descending to 10,558 ft over San Pancrazio, Italy. The descent phase was characterized by a significant decrease in altitude, from 36,010 ft to 10,558 ft in 14 minutes, covering 85 nm. The aircraft then entered a series of level cruises, alternating between ascending and descending phases, before initiating its final approach to runway 08R at Munich Airport.
The final approach was executed from the west, with the aircraft heading 83.0° at 4 nm and 1,414 ft agl. The landing was successful, with the aircraft touching down 78 m beyond the touchdown zone at a speed of 131 kt. The touchdown rate was good at -164 fpm, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The total landing distance was 1,561 m, accounting for 39% of the runway. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, covering a distance of 1 nm in 5 minutes. The total flight distance was 350 nm, with a flight time of 76 minutes and a fuel consumption of 3,885 kg.
The final approach to runway 08R at EDDM Munich Airport from the west was executed with a heading of 83.0° at 4 nm and 1,414 ft above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height achieved. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 139 kt, indicating a slight deviation from the optimal landing speed.
As the aircraft touched down on the runway, the touchdown point was 78 m beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was a little fast at 131 kt. Nevertheless, the touchdown rate was good at -164 fpm, indicating a controlled descent. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 6 °C and a wind of 1 kt at 303°, contributed to a relatively calm landing environment, with a negligible crosswind and a slight tailwind of 1 kt.
The total landing distance was 1,561 m, which accounted for 39% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good, with the aircraft maintaining its centerline alignment throughout the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was executed with a high degree of precision and control, resulting in a score of 98.1%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values