Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 27 stages, 25 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,389 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,389 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 342 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, it is evident that there are significant areas in which improvement can be made in order to achieve a higher landing score. Let's break down the specific issues observed during each phase of the landing process and discuss potential ways to address them.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is clear that there were issues with the descent path above the glideslope limit and poor heading alignment. To improve in this area, it is important for the pilot to closely monitor and adjust the descent rate in order to stay within the designated glideslope. Additionally, maintaining proper heading alignment throughout the approach will help ensure a smoother transition into the Landing Phase.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is evident that there were several areas of concern. The threshold height being significantly above target suggests a lack of precision during descent. Improving the landing flare technique and maintaining proper heading and bank angle stability during landing will help achieve a smoother touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, the heavy touchdown rate indicates a need for improved control and finesse during the landing sequence. However, it is encouraging to see that the speed was on target and the touchdown distance was inside the designated zone. Focusing on achieving a softer touchdown and maintaining control throughout the landing process will help improve overall performance.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being slightly off center indicates a need for increased attention to detail when guiding the aircraft post-touchdown. Ensuring a precise alignment with the runway centerline will help improve the overall landing score and enhance safety during the rollout phase.
In conclusion, while there are areas in need of improvement, it is important to view these findings as opportunities for growth and development. By focusing on the specific areas identified and implementing strategies to address them, pilots can work towards achieving a higher landing score and enhancing their overall performance. Keep practicing and paying attention to detail, and you will see improvement over time.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values