Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 21 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 152 m above the runway. The 305 m gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,438 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,438 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 325 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
First of all, I want to commend the pilot for achieving an overall landing score of 87.6%. This is a commendable score and shows a level of skill and expertise in handling the aircraft during the landing phase.
In the Approach Phase, it is noted that there was a poor descent path above the glideslope limit. While this is an area for improvement, it is important to recognize that maintaining the correct descent path is crucial for a safe and smooth landing. I encourage the pilot to focus on improving their descent path accuracy in future landings.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is fantastic to see that the threshold height was well above the target and that a good landing flare was executed. These are key components of a successful landing and indicate a strong understanding of the landing process. Keep up the good work in these areas.
In the Touchdown Phase, there were a few areas that could be improved upon. The touchdown rate was noted as hard, and the speed was slightly above the target. It is important to aim for a smooth touchdown with the correct speed to ensure the safety of the aircraft and passengers. Additionally, the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone is a positive point, indicating good alignment with the runway.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off, with a deviation of 5.2 m from the centerline. While this is a minor deviation, it is still important to strive for precise alignment during rollout. Consistency in runway alignment will help improve overall landing performance.
Overall, this landing score of 87.6% is a great accomplishment, and I encourage the pilot to continue honing their skills and focusing on areas of improvement. Keep up the good work and strive for excellence in all phases of the landing process. With dedication and practice, I have no doubt that even higher scores can be achieved in the future. Keep flying high!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values