Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Hold a little more back pressure through the last of the flare to arrest the sink before 264 fpm develops.
What happened: Touchdown sink rate was 264 fpm, a firm arrival with no other fault on this landing to account for it.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: minimal sink at touchdown
There are several things that can go wrong during the flare, carrying too much speed over the threshold, starting the flare at the wrong height and inconsistent flight control inputs, all contribute to a poor flare resulting in a hard touchdown or a float down the runway.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,497 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 495 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Singapore Changi Airport, the Boeing 737-800 began its journey on runway 20C, taking off with a takeoff distance of 1,347 meters, which was 33% of the available runway length. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 154 knots, overcoming a headwind of 4 knots and a crosswind of 3 knots. The local temperature was 36 degrees Celsius, with a wind direction of 169 degrees.
As the aircraft climbed out of Singapore, it began its enroute climb, reaching an altitude of 38,818 feet above sea level in 38 minutes, covering a distance of 278 nautical miles. The climb started 1 mile west of Changi Air Base (East) and continued until the aircraft reached its cruising altitude. The enroute level cruise phase followed, lasting 305 minutes and covering 2,510 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent, reducing its altitude from 38,990 feet to 5,013 feet in 22 minutes, covering 173 nautical miles. This descent phase was followed by a brief level cruise, lasting 5 minutes and covering 23 nautical miles, before the aircraft began its final descent.
The Boeing 737-800 landed on runway 22 at Tokyo Haneda International Airport, with a touchdown point 78 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 127 knots, which was a little fast, but the touchdown rate was good at -171 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the runway rollout alignment was perfect. The local temperature was 18 degrees Celsius, with a wind direction of 190 degrees. The total landing distance was 931 meters, which was 37% of the available runway length. After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking 3 minutes to cover less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 3,004 nautical miles, taking 383 minutes, and the aircraft used 16,246 kilograms of fuel.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 22 at RJTT Tokyo Haneda International Airport, marking a successful conclusion to the approach from the north east. The aircraft's descent was characterized by good approach quality, with a steady and controlled rate of descent that allowed for a smooth touchdown. The threshold height was well-maintained, and the aircraft's speed was above the target threshold speed of 130 kt, coming in at 136 kt.
As the aircraft made contact with the runway, the touchdown point was 78 m beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slight over-run. However, the touchdown speed of 127 kt was a little fast, and the touchdown rate of -171 fpm was slightly higher than desired. Despite these minor deviations, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, with the aircraft remaining centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 18 °C and a gentle headwind of 5 kt, contributed to a stable and predictable approach.
The aircraft's rollout was characterized by perfect alignment, with the aircraft remaining centered on the runway throughout the rollout phase. The total landing distance of 931 m was 37% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing distance. Overall, the landing was considered a success, with a score of 99.8% reflecting the high level of proficiency demonstrated by the crew.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values