Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smoother, smaller aileron inputs to keep the wings level and hold bank angle near wings-level during the climb.
What happened: During the climb, bank angle rose to 1.7°, more roll than the climb out called for.
Watch for: Attitude indicator: wings level during the climb
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 40 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 40 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 40 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,875 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,875 m of the 2,617 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 942 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A320 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Munich Airport, taking approximately 9 minutes to cover a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 26R, with a takeoff distance of 2,070 meters, which accounted for 52% of the runway. The liftoff speed was recorded at 168 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of Munich Airport, it began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile west of the airport and reaching an altitude of 37,981 feet above sea level. This climb phase covered a distance of 110 nautical miles and took 19 minutes to complete, with an increase in altitude of 35,570 feet. The local weather conditions at the time were characterized by a temperature of 20 degrees Celsius.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 1 mile east of Hassfurt, a town in Bavaria, Germany. This cruise phase lasted for 82 minutes and covered a distance of 543 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 2 miles northwest of Aughton, a town in Lancashire, England. This descent phase took 17 minutes to complete, covering a distance of 98 nautical miles, and resulted in a decrease in altitude of 29,304 feet.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 14 miles northeast of Loughshinny, a town in Leinster, Ireland. This cruise phase lasted for 53 minutes and covered a distance of 25 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent phase, starting 15 miles northeast of Greystones, another town in Leinster, Ireland. This descent phase took 6 minutes to complete, covering a distance of 20 nautical miles, and resulted in a decrease in altitude of 6,496 feet.
The final approach to runway 28L at Dublin Airport was made from the east, with a heading of 275.0 degrees at an altitude of 1,275 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on runway 28L, which had a length of 2,617 meters. The threshold height at 78 feet above ground level was well above the target, and the threshold speed was good at 135 knots.
The touchdown point was 520 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 123 knots, which was considered good. The touchdown rate was excellent at -67 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 6.2 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 18 degrees Celsius.
The total landing distance was 1,788 meters, which accounted for 68% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good. After landing, the aircraft took 6 minutes to taxi to the parking area, covering a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 805 nautical miles, taking a total of 150 minutes, and the aircraft used 4,682 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed on runway 28L at Dublin Airport (EIDW) with a score of 84.6%. The aircraft was approaching the runway from the east, heading 275.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,275 feet above ground level (agl).
The final approach to the runway was executed well, with the aircraft touching down at a speed of 123 knots, which is within the acceptable range. The touchdown rate was also excellent, at -67 feet per minute (fpm), indicating a smooth and controlled descent. However, the threshold height at 78 feet agl was slightly above the target, suggesting that the aircraft may have been slightly high on its approach.
The touchdown point was 520 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively long distance. This may be due to the aircraft's speed and altitude at the time of touchdown, or it may indicate that the pilots were not fully aligned with the runway centerline. The runway touchdown position was also slightly misaligned by 6.2 meters from the centerline, which may have contributed to the long touchdown distance.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 18°C. The total landing distance was 1,788 meters, which is 68% of the runway length. This is a relatively long landing distance, but it is not excessively long considering the aircraft's speed and altitude at touchdown.
The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilots were able to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout phase and align it with the runway centerline. Overall, the landing was executed well, but there were some minor issues with the threshold height and touchdown point alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values