Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,770 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,770 m of the 3,704 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 836 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
First and foremost, let me start by saying that landing an aircraft is no easy feat, and an 82.3% score is not a bad result at all. It's evident that there were some areas in which improvement can be made, but it's important to acknowledge the successes and progress that were made during the landing.
In the Approach Phase, it's clear that the descent path was above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly above the target. While this may have impacted the landing, it's essential to remember that maintaining the correct descent path and speed can be challenging, especially in adverse weather conditions or high-traffic environments. It's crucial to continue practicing and refining these skills in order to improve overall performance in future landings.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, there were a few areas that could use some improvement. The threshold height was above the target, and the landing flare was deemed very poor. It's important to focus on proper technique during the landing phase, including maintaining the correct height above the threshold and executing a smooth and controlled landing flare. Consistent practice and feedback from instructors can help to refine these skills and improve overall performance during landings.
In the Touchdown Phase, there were a few key areas that stood out as needing improvement. The touchdown rate was firm, and the speed was slightly above the target. Additionally, the touchdown point was significantly beyond the touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was off-center. It's important to focus on executing a smooth and controlled touchdown, ensuring that the aircraft lands within the designated zone and on the centerline of the runway. Continued practice and attention to detail in these areas can help to improve overall landing performance.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, it was noted that the runway alignment was off-center. It's crucial to focus on maintaining proper alignment during the rollout phase, ensuring that the aircraft stays centered on the runway for a safe and controlled landing. Continued practice and attention to detail in this area can help to improve overall performance and enhance the overall landing score.
In conclusion, while there were areas for improvement in the aircraft landing, it's important to remember that progress is a journey. By acknowledging the areas that need improvement and continuing to practice and refine skills, overall landing performance can be enhanced. Keep up the hard work and dedication, and remember that every landing is an opportunity to learn and grow as a pilot.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values