Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
See Arrival Final 1
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: off the centreline and speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: off the centreline and speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,130 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 133 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with taxiing from the parking area to the runway, which took approximately 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-600, then departed from runway 30 at CYBL Campbell River Airport in Campbell River, British Columbia, Canada. The takeoff distance was 943 meters, which accounted for 48% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 148 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of CYBL Campbell River Airport, it began its enroute climb 1 mile northwest of the airport. The climb started at an altitude of 1,349 feet above sea level and reached a maximum altitude of 38,811 feet above sea level, an increase of 37,462 feet in 29 minutes. During this time, the aircraft covered a distance of 185 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 1 mile west of White Center, Washington, United States, and lasted for 89 minutes. During this phase, the aircraft covered a distance of 746 nautical miles. The enroute descent started 6 miles northeast of Hildale, Utah, United States, and lasted for 9 minutes. The aircraft descended from 39,327 feet above sea level to 8,284 feet above sea level, a decrease of 31,043 feet in 9 minutes, covering a distance of 128 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 21 at KFLG Flagstaff Pulliam International Airport was made from the northeast, heading 224.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,259 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 21 was successful, with a touchdown distance of 750 meters, which accounted for 35% of the runway. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also good at 126 knots. However, the touchdown speed was a little fast at 124 knots, and the touchdown rate was good at -170 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 27 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 3 knots at 220 degrees. The crosswind was 0 knots, and the headwind was 3 knots. After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, which took less than 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,064 nautical miles, and the total flight time was 132 minutes. The aircraft used 6,641 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-600 aircraft successfully landed at KFLG Flagstaff Pulliam International Airport, demonstrating a high level of proficiency in its approach and landing procedures. The aircraft was approaching the runway from the north east, heading 224.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,259 feet above ground level (agl).
The pilot's final approach to runway 21 was executed with precision, achieving a score of 98.9%. The aircraft's speed and altitude were well-managed, with a threshold speed of 126 knots and a good threshold height. The touchdown distance of 133 meters was also within acceptable limits, indicating that the pilot had sufficient control over the aircraft's descent.
However, there was a slight deviation from the ideal touchdown speed, which was recorded at 124 knots. This was slightly faster than the recommended speed, but it did not significantly impact the overall performance of the landing. The touchdown rate of -170 feet per minute (fpm) was also within the acceptable range, indicating that the pilot had successfully controlled the aircraft's descent.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 27°C and a gentle headwind of 3 knots from 220°. The crosswind component was negligible, at 0 knots. The runway length of 2,130 meters was more than sufficient to accommodate the aircraft's landing distance of 750 meters, which accounted for only 35% of the available runway.
The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the pilot had successfully controlled the aircraft's rotation and deceleration after touchdown. Overall, the landing was executed with a high degree of precision and control, demonstrating the pilot's expertise and proficiency in handling the Boeing 737-600 aircraft.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values