Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 305 m and 152 m above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,821 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,821 m of the 2,944 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 795 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 7 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 07 at EDDS Stuttgart Airport, with a takeoff distance of 1,769 meters, which accounted for 58% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 171 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 6 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 2 knots at 298 degrees. The crosswind and tailwind components were both 2 knots. As the aircraft climbed, it started to ascend from 659 meters above sea level to 10,796 meters above sea level, an increase of 10,136.8 meters, in 23 minutes and covering 154 nautical miles.
The enroute climb started 1 mile north west of Neuhausen auf den Fildern, a town in the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. The aircraft then leveled off and entered a cruise phase, which lasted 20 minutes and covered 152 nautical miles. This cruise phase started 1 mile south east of Jesberg, a town in the state of Hessen, Germany.
The aircraft then began another climb phase, this time from 10,973 meters above sea level to 11,277 meters above sea level, an increase of 303.6 meters, in 2 minutes and covering 12 nautical miles. This climb phase started overhead Dollern, a town in the state of Lower Saxony, Germany. The aircraft then entered another cruise phase, which lasted 38 minutes and covered 277 nautical miles. This cruise phase started overhead Altenmoor, a town in the state of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent from 11,278 meters above sea level to 1,293 meters above sea level, a decrease of 9,985.4 meters, in 20 minutes and covering 116 nautical miles. This descent phase started 12 miles south east of Arendal, a town in the state of Agder, Norway. The aircraft then leveled off and entered another short cruise phase, which lasted 2 minutes and covered 6 nautical miles. This cruise phase started 3 miles west of Lillestrom, a town in the state of Viken, Norway.
The aircraft then began its final descent phase, which started 1 mile south of Ask, a town in the state of Viken, Norway. The descent was from 1,123 meters above sea level to 630 meters above sea level, a decrease of 492.6 meters, in 2 minutes and covering 5 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 01R at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, was from the south, with a heading of 16.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 422.1 meters above ground level. The landing was made on runway 01R, which had a length of 2,944 meters. The threshold height at 18.3 meters above ground level was above the target, but the threshold speed was good at 138 knots.
The touchdown point was 378 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 132 knots, which was good. The touchdown rate was fair at -1.2 meters per second. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -9 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 0 knots at 208 degrees. The crosswind and headwind components were both 0 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,739 meters, which accounted for 59% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 3 minutes and covered less than
The aircraft, identified as an A21N, successfully landed at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 91.2%. The final approach was conducted from the south, heading 16.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 422.1 meters above ground level (agl).
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on runway 01R, which has a length of 2,944 meters. The threshold height at 18.3 meters agl was above the target, indicating that the aircraft was slightly higher than desired at the point of touchdown. However, the threshold speed was good, reaching 138 knots, which is within the acceptable range.
The touchdown point was located 378 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively long distance. The touchdown speed of 132 knots was good, indicating that the aircraft was able to slow down effectively before touching down. However, the touchdown rate of -1.2 meters per second was fair, suggesting that the aircraft could have slowed down more smoothly.
The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was aligned with the runway centerline at the point of touchdown. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -9°C and a wind speed of 0 knots from a direction of 208°. There was no crosswind or headwind, which made the landing conditions relatively favorable.
The total landing distance was 1,739 meters, which is 59% of the runway length. This is a relatively long landing distance, but it is not uncommon for aircraft of this size and type. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain its alignment with the runway centerline during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, but there were some areas for improvement, particularly in terms of the touchdown rate and the landing distance. However, the aircraft's score of 91.2% indicates that the landing was generally good, and the pilot's skills and experience were able to compensate for any minor issues.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values