Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,442 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 667 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Congratulations on achieving an aircraft landing score of 88.0%! While there were some areas that could be improved upon, there were also several positive aspects to your landing.
Let's start with the Approach Phase. It's noted that there was a poor descent path above the glideslope limit. This is an important aspect to pay attention to as it affects the overall stability of the approach. It would be beneficial to work on maintaining a more accurate descent path in future landings.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the threshold height was above target and the landing flare was rated as very poor. These are areas that can greatly impact the smoothness and precision of the landing. Focusing on correcting these aspects, such as ensuring the correct height above the threshold and improving the landing flare technique, can lead to more consistent and successful landings.
In the Touchdown Phase, it's commendable that the touchdown rate was good and the landing speed was on target. Additionally, the touchdown point was slightly beyond the designated zone, but the runway touchdown position was rated as very good. These are positive indicators of skill and precision in executing the landing.
However, it's important to note that you landed with a 16 kn tailwind, which poses a safety concern and should be avoided in future landings. Tailwinds can affect the handling of the aircraft and increase the landing distance required, so always strive to land into the wind when possible.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off, being 4.9 m from the centerline. Maintaining proper runway alignment is crucial for a safe and smooth rollout. Paying attention to aligning the aircraft with the centerline during the rollout phase will enhance the overall landing performance.
Overall, your landing score of 88.0% is a solid achievement. By focusing on improving areas such as descent path control, threshold height, landing flare technique, avoiding tailwinds, and runway alignment, you can continue to refine your skills and achieve even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in your flying techniques. Great job!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values