Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 18 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,537 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,537 m of the 3,297 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 433 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 87.8% indicates a fairly successful landing, with room for improvement in certain areas.
Firstly, in the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit. This suggests that there was some difficulty in maintaining the appropriate vertical profile during the descent. It is important to closely monitor the aircraft's altitude and ensure smooth and controlled descent.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the threshold height being well above the target and a very poor landing flare indicates that there were some issues with the landing technique. It is crucial to have a smooth and gradual descent towards the runway threshold and to perform a proper landing flare to ensure a soft touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, while the touchdown rate was hard, it is positive to see that the speed was on target and the touchdown distance fell within the designated touchdown zone. However, the runway touchdown position being 1.9 meters from the centerline suggests that there was some misalignment during touchdown. This can be improved through better alignment and centerline tracking during the approach.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, it is encouraging to see that the runway alignment was very good. This indicates that the aircraft was well controlled during the rollout and maintained a straight path down the runway.
Overall, while there were areas for improvement identified in the landing analysis, it is important to acknowledge the positive aspects and use this feedback to focus on areas that need attention. With continued practice and focus on technique, you can strive for even better landings and enhance your skills as a pilot. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in your aircraft operations.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values