Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,357 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 194 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft, an Airbus A320, taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Vancouver International Airport (CYVR). This process took approximately 8 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The departure roll took place on runway 08R, and the takeoff distance was 1,664 meters, which accounted for 51% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 161 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to its cruising altitude, it encountered local weather conditions of 12°C temperature and a wind speed of 4 knots at 120 degrees. The crosswind was minimal at 1 knot, while the headwind was 4 knots. The enroute climb started over the Vancouver International Seaplane Base (CAM9), where the aircraft ascended from 1,033 feet above sea level to 37,108 feet, a total increase of 36,075 feet in 13 minutes. This climb covered a distance of 158 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 18 miles northwest of Midway Airport (CBM6) and lasted for 26 minutes, covering a distance of 724 nautical miles. The descent started 8 miles southwest of Rivers (Manitoba, Canada), where the aircraft descended from 36,278 feet to 2,139 feet, a decrease of 34,139 feet in 15 minutes. This descent covered a distance of 121 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 36 at Winnipeg / James Armstrong Richardson International Airport (CYWG) was made from the south, with a heading of 9.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,352 feet above ground level. The landing took place on a runway with a length of 3,357 meters, and the threshold height was good. The threshold speed was also satisfactory at 136 knots. However, the touchdown speed was a little fast at 134 knots, and the touchdown rate was firm at -336 feet per minute.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.9 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were -2°C temperature and a wind speed of 9 knots at 340 degrees. The crosswind was 4 knots, while the headwind was 8 knots. The total landing distance was 1,146 meters, which accounted for 34% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good.
After landing, the aircraft taxiied to the parking area, taking approximately 2 minutes and covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,011 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 64 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 5,613 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at Winnipeg / James Armstrong Richardson International Airport (CYWG) with a score of 97.2%. The aircraft approached the runway from the south, heading 9.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,352 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with good control, and the aircraft touched down on runway 36, which has a length of 3,357 meters.
The threshold height was satisfactory, and the threshold speed was maintained at 136 knots, indicating a well-executed approach. The touchdown distance was also within acceptable limits at 196 meters. However, the touchdown speed of 134 knots was slightly higher than the ideal speed, which may have resulted in a firmer touchdown rate of -336 feet per minute (fpm). This could potentially have caused some stress on the aircraft's landing gear.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 4.9 meters, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the approach or a minor issue with the aircraft's navigation system. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -2°C and a wind speed of 9 knots from 340°. The crosswind component was minimal at 4 knots, while the headwind component was 8 knots, which may have contributed to the slight misalignment.
The total landing distance of 1,146 meters was within 34% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing roll. The runway rollout alignment was very good, suggesting that the aircraft's brakes were applied smoothly and effectively, and the pilot maintained control throughout the landing roll. Overall, the landing was executed with good control and precision, resulting in a high score of 97.2%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values