Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 18 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 11,013 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 1,299 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The 1.73 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 84.4% indicates a proficient landing with room for improvement. Let's break down the analysis of each phase of the landing to see where there are opportunities for enhancement.
In the Approach Phase, the poor descent path above the glideslope limit suggests that the descent of the aircraft was not as smooth as desired. This could potentially be improved by adjusting the descent rate to ensure the aircraft stays within the glideslope limits for a more steady approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the slightly above target threshold height is a minor issue that can easily be corrected with better altitude management during the approach. However, the excellent landing flare is a positive note, indicating a smooth transition from descent to touchdown.
The Touchdown Phase is where there is some room for improvement. The hard touchdown rate and slightly above target speed suggest that the landing was not as soft as desired. Adjusting the touchdown technique and speed control could help improve this aspect. On a brighter note, the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone is good, showing accuracy in placement on the runway. The runway touchdown position being 11.7 m from the centerline could be improved for better alignment.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 24.2 m from the centerline indicates the need for better alignment during the rollout after landing. Ensuring a straight path down the runway can enhance overall landing performance.
Overall, while the landing score is a respectable 84.4%, there are specific areas to focus on for improvement. By addressing the issues in the Approach, Landing, Touchdown, and Rollout Phases, the pilot can work towards achieving a more precise and smoother landing in the future. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in all aspects of aircraft operation.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values