Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,494 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 628 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 4 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-600, then departed from runway 14R at UWUU Ufa International Airport in Ufa, Russia. The takeoff distance was 858 meters, which accounted for 23% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 144 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 9°C and a wind speed of 2 knots at 219°. The crosswind was 1 knot, and the headwind was also 1 knot. After departing from Ufa, the aircraft began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile south of the airport and reaching an altitude of 40,012 feet above sea level. The climb was a significant increase of 38,525 feet in 36 minutes, covering a distance of 233 nautical miles.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise, starting 7 miles south of UTTF Stolbishchi Airport in Stolbishchi, Russia. This cruise phase lasted for 164 minutes and covered a distance of 1,218 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 5 miles north of Fossby in Viken, Norway. The descent was from an altitude of 39,823 feet to 3,132 feet, a decrease of 36,691 feet in just 15 minutes, covering a distance of 179 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, starting 5 miles northeast of Undeim in Rogaland Fylke, Norway. This brief cruise phase lasted only 2 minutes and covered a distance of 6 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, starting 1 mile southwest of Lyefjell in Rogaland Fylke, Norway. The descent was from an altitude of 2,703 feet to 1,311 feet, a decrease of 1,392 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 6 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached Stavanger Airport, Sola, it began its final approach to runway 36 from the south, heading 359.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,282 feet above ground level. The landing was successful, with a touchdown point 207 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was a little fast at 120 knots, but the touchdown rate was fair at -239 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the local weather conditions were a temperature of 10°C and a wind speed of 8 knots at 330°.
The total landing distance was 1,010 meters, which accounted for 41% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect. After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking, taking less than 1 minute and covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,649 nautical miles, taking 225 minutes and using 9,557 kilograms of fuel.
The Boeing 737-600 aircraft successfully landed at ENZV Stavanger Airport, Sola, with a score of 97.0%. The final approach to runway 36 was initiated from the south, heading 359.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,282 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft maintained a good threshold height, and the threshold speed was also satisfactory at 128 knots.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed 207 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is slightly beyond the ideal spot. However, the touchdown speed of 120 knots was a bit faster than desired, indicating that the pilot may have needed to apply more braking force upon touchdown. The touchdown rate of -239 feet per minute (fpm) was considered fair, suggesting that the aircraft's descent was not excessively steep.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 10°C, with a wind speed of 8 knots from 330°. This resulted in a crosswind of 4 knots and a headwind of 7 knots, which the pilot effectively managed during the landing. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway centerline.
The total landing distance of 1,010 meters was 41% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, suggesting that the pilot maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft coming to a stop safely and efficiently.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values