Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
In the last part of the flare, hold a little more back pressure to fully arrest the sink before the mains touch down.
What happened: Threshold speed and height were within limits, and the flare began on time and arrested the sink normally; even so, the touchdown rate was 254 fpm, a firm touchdown.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smooth, gentle rate at touchdown
A typical trainer rotates in the mid-50s of knots - a 172 at around 55 KIAS, climbing out at a Vy in the low 70s, though check your own POH rather than memorising Cessna's numbers - and the transferable rule is that Vr sits just above the stall speed in takeoff configuration. Rotate early because "it felt ready" and the aircraft lifts off inside ground effect, where induced drag is reduced, then climbs out of it into more drag. On a marginal-performance day the result is an aircraft that lifts off and then refuses to climb, sagging back towards the runway.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,609 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 468 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The Airbus A320 taxied from the parking area to runway 25 at Monseñor Óscar Arnulfo Romero International Airport; the taxi-out required 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nm.
The aircraft departed runway 25, MSLP, with a takeoff roll of 1,167 m representing 37 % of the runway. Liftoff speed was 150 kt. Local weather reported a temperature of 18 °C, wind 2 kt from 270°, crosswind 1 kt and headwind 2 kt.
Climb commenced overhead the departure airport, climbing from 1,115 ft asl to 16,995 ft asl, an increase of 15,880 ft in 5 minutes while covering 22 nm.
Level cruise began 1 mile south of Ilopango and lasted 2 minutes, covering 8 nm.
A subsequent climb started 3 miles southwest of Tenancingo, climbing from 17,181 ft asl to 17,721 ft asl, an increase of 541 ft in 2 minutes and covering 8 nm.
Level cruise then began 5 miles northeast of Tenancingo and continued for 11 minutes, covering 57 nm.
Descent began 5 miles south of El Nispero, descending from 17,740 ft asl to 2,616 ft asl, a decrease of 15,123 ft in 14 minutes and covering 66 nm.
A further level cruise started 7 miles northeast of San Jose del Boquerón, lasting 3 minutes and covering 7 nm.
Final approach to runway 22 at Ramón Villeda Morales International Airport was from the northeast, on a heading of 220.0° at 4 nm and 1,266 ft agl.
Landing on runway 22, whose length is 2,609 m, occurred with a threshold speed slightly above target at 121 kt. Touchdown was 52 m beyond the touchdown zone, at 116 kt, with a touchdown rate of minus 203 fpm and a runway touchdown position misaligned by 8.2 m from centreline. Local weather reported a temperature of 27 °C, wind 9 kt from 89°, crosswind 7 kt and tailwind 6 kt. Total landing distance was 1,423 m, 55 % of the runway.
The aircraft rolled out on runway 22, maintaining alignment within 8.0 m of the centreline.
Overall, the flight covered 175 nm, taking 40, and used 1,901 kg of fuel.
The aircraft in question, an RJ85, successfully landed at Benito Juárez International Airport (MMMX) on runway 05R. The final approach was executed from the southwest, heading 60.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,425 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft demonstrated a high level of proficiency in its approach, achieving a score of 99.1%.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway with a speed of 97 knots, which was within the acceptable range. The touchdown distance of 393 meters was also satisfactory, indicating that the pilot had maintained control and precision throughout the landing process. However, the touchdown rate of -205 feet per minute (fpm) was only fair, suggesting that the pilot may have been able to improve their descent rate to achieve a smoother landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 24°C and a gentle wind of 7 knots from a direction of 40°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 6 knots, which helped to stabilize the aircraft during the landing. The runway length of 3,441 meters was more than sufficient to accommodate the aircraft's landing distance of 1,103 meters, which was only 32% of the available runway.
The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the pilot had maintained precise control and alignment during the final stages of the approach. Similarly, the runway rollout alignment was also perfect, demonstrating the pilot's ability to maintain control and stability during the post-landing phase. Overall, the landing was executed with a high degree of precision and control, and the pilot's performance was commendable.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values