Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 25 stages, 23 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,725 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,725 m of the 2,863 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 747 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 93.0% is commendable and shows a strong level of proficiency in various aspects of the landing process. Let's break down each phase of the landing and provide some insights on areas for improvement.
In the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit, which could potentially lead to an unstable approach. This is an important aspect to focus on as it impacts the overall accuracy and smoothness of the landing. Ensuring that the descent path is within the necessary parameters will help in achieving a more controlled and precise landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the threshold height slightly above the target is a minor deviation but still worth considering for future landings. Additionally, the very poor landing flare indicates a need for improvement in the timing and execution of the flare maneuver. This is crucial for achieving a smooth touchdown and reducing the risk of a hard landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, the fair touchdown rate and on-target speed are positive points to note. However, landing 339 m beyond the touchdown zone and 1.8 m from the centerline suggests a need for better spatial awareness and alignment during the landing. Additionally, landing with a 5 kn tailwind is a safety concern that should be avoided in future landings.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the very good runway alignment is a strong point that showcases good control and coordination during the landing rollout. This indicates a good understanding of runway dynamics and the ability to maintain a straight path post-landing.
Overall, your landing score of 93.0% reflects a solid performance with room for improvement in specific areas such as descent path control, landing flare execution, spatial awareness during touchdown, and avoiding tailwind landings. By focusing on these key aspects and continuing to practice and refine your skills, you can further enhance your landing proficiency and achieve even better scores in the future. Keep up the good work, and remember that continuous learning and improvement are essential in mastering the art of aircraft landings.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values