Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smooth aileron to roll the wings level in the first climb segment, holding bank angle near wings-level instead of letting it build to 1.3°.
What happened: The wings held 1.3° of bank through the first climb segment and had drifted to 5.7° by the second - this early wing-level drift usually carries through into a larger bank excursion later in the climb.
Watch for: Watch the attitude indicator's bank pointer and keep it at wings level throughout the climb.
A good takeoff has a defined shape. It also has a defined end. For an airliner that's thrust reduction and acceleration, commonly somewhere around 1,000 to 1,500 ft above the airfield depending on the operator, while for a light aircraft it's established at Vy with the flaps on schedule. Most simmers have no defined end to their takeoff, which is exactly why it never gets judged.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,891 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 202 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Vienna International Airport (LOWW), the aircraft began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 9 minutes and covered 3 nautical miles. With the local weather conditions at 15 °C and a wind speed of 12 kt at 120 °, the aircraft took off from runway 34, utilizing 35% of the 3,600-meter runway and achieving liftoff at a speed of 142 kt.
As the aircraft climbed to 30,008 feet above sea level, it covered a distance of 76 nautical miles in 12 minutes, increasing its altitude by 28,385 feet. The enroute climb phase started over Vienna, and the aircraft continued to ascend until it reached its cruising altitude. The initial level cruise phase lasted 7 minutes, covering 60 nautical miles, before the aircraft began its descent towards Innsbruck Airport (LOWI). The descent phase was characterized by several level cruise segments, with the aircraft maintaining a steady altitude before descending again. The final approach to runway 08 at LOWI was initiated from the west, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 80.0 ° at 3 nautical miles and 1,147 feet above ground level.
The aircraft landed on runway 08 at LOWI, utilizing 60% of the 1,891-meter runway and achieving a touchdown distance of 204 meters. The touchdown speed was slightly higher than the threshold speed, at 122 kt, but the touchdown rate was firm at -380 fpm. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the aircraft taxied to the parking area in 1 minute, covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 299 nautical miles, taking 59 minutes, and the aircraft used 937 kg of fuel during the journey.
The final approach to runway 08 at LOWI Innsbruck Airport from the west, heading 80.0° at 3 nm and 1,147 ft agl, was executed with good approach quality. The aircraft maintained a stable and controlled descent, with a threshold height that was well within the acceptable limits. The threshold speed of 125 kt was also satisfactory, indicating a well-coordinated approach.
As the aircraft touched down on the runway, the touchdown distance of 204 m was within the acceptable range, demonstrating good control and precision. However, the touchdown speed of 122 kt was slightly faster than the recommended value, resulting in a firm touchdown rate of -380 fpm. Despite this, the runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 13 °C and a wind of 13 kt at 130°, contributed to a relatively straightforward landing.
The total landing distance of 1,132 m, which accounted for 60% of the runway length, was within the acceptable range. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.7 m from the centreline, indicating a minor deviation from the ideal path. Overall, the landing was executed with a high degree of precision and control, resulting in a score of 95.5%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values