Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 17 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,899 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,899 m of the 4,085 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 663 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
While achieving an aircraft landing score of 80.7% is a commendable achievement, there are several areas that can be improved for even better performance in the future.
The approach phase showed a poor descent path above the glideslope limit. This can be improved by closely monitoring and adjusting the descent rate to stay within the glideslope limits.
During the landing phase, the threshold height was well above the target, indicating the need for better control and judgment during the approach. Additionally, the landing flare was very poor, which can be improved by mastering the technique and timing of the flare to ensure a smoother touchdown.
In the touchdown phase, while the touchdown rate was firm and the speed was on target, the touchdown point being 238 meters beyond the touchdown zone is a significant area for improvement. It is essential to focus on accurately estimating the touchdown point and adjusting the approach accordingly to ensure proper alignment with the runway.
Furthermore, the runway touchdown position being 8.2 meters from the centerline and the rollout phase showing a runway alignment of 16.8 meters from the centerline indicate the need for better alignment and control during the landing and rollout phases. Close attention should be paid to maintaining runway alignment and centerline control to improve overall landing performance.
Overall, while an 80.7% landing score is a good starting point, there is room for improvement in various aspects of the landing process. By focusing on improving descent path, flare technique, touchdown point accuracy, and runway alignment, future landings can be even more successful. Keep practicing and refining your skills to achieve even better results in your next landing attempts. You've got this!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values