Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 4.7 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Keep the back pressure coming once the flare is established, holding the nose up through to touchdown instead of easing it.
What happened: The flare arrested the sink but 137 fpm of it came back before touchdown, and in flights like this one that returning sink usually carries through to a firm or hard touchdown at 328 fpm.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: the sink held near zero all the way through touchdown, not allowed to build back up.
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: seven checks where the approach path is 300 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
At the 300 ft gate: off the centreline and wings not level.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,297 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 231 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Nice-Côte d'Azur Airport, the aircraft began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 17 minutes and covered a distance of 4 nautical miles. With a local temperature of 10°C and wind conditions of 10 kt at 10°, the aircraft took off from runway 04R, utilizing 36% of the available runway length to achieve a takeoff distance of 1,061 meters. The liftoff speed was 89 kt, and the aircraft climbed away from the airport.
As the aircraft transitioned into the enroute climb phase, it began to ascend from 641 ft above sea level to 17,524 ft, an increase of 16,883 ft in just 7 minutes, covering a distance of 17 nautical miles. The climb phase was punctuated by several level cruise segments, including a 7-minute cruise at 5 miles south of Ventimiglia, Italy, and a 52-minute cruise at 7 miles east of Noli, Italy, covering a distance of 233 nautical miles. The aircraft also underwent several descent phases, including a 11-minute descent from 25,996 ft to 7,001 ft, a decrease of 18,995 ft in 11 minutes, covering 40 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 12 at Ljubljana Jože Pučnik Airport was initiated from the north-west, with the aircraft descending from 2,034 ft to 2,034 ft in 3 minutes, covering 6 nautical miles. The landing was successful, with a touchdown distance of 231 meters and a touchdown speed of 70 kt. The total landing distance was 1,045 meters, utilizing 32% of the available runway length. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 4 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 383 nautical miles, taking 116 minutes, and the aircraft used 365 kg of fuel.
The final approach to runway 12 at LJLJ Ljubljana Jože Pučnik Airport from the north west was executed with a heading of 126.0° at 0 nm and 271 ft above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 79 kt, which was within the acceptable range. The aircraft maintained a steady descent, touching down at a speed of 70 kt, which was also within the desired parameters. The touchdown distance of 231 m was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -347 fpm was firm but not excessive.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.2 m from the centreline, indicating a minor deviation from the desired path. However, the aircraft's centreline alignment during the rollout phase was also slightly off, by 14.8 m, which may have been a result of the initial misalignment. The total landing distance of 1,045 m was 32% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 12 °C and a wind of 10 kt at 99°, contributed to a relatively calm landing environment, with a crosswind of 4 kt and a headwind of 9 kt.
Overall, the landing was satisfactory, with a score of 92.4%. While there were minor deviations from the desired path, the aircraft's performance during the approach, touchdown, and rollout phases was generally good. The pilot's ability to maintain a steady descent and control the aircraft's speed and rate of descent was commendable, and the landing was executed safely and efficiently.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values