Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Raise the gear lever promptly once a positive climb is confirmed, before reaching the target retraction height.
What happened: Gear retraction was delayed, with the gear not coming up until 0 m.
Watch for: Landing gear: up by the normal retraction gate
Arrival
Add power earlier on final to hold VREF of 139 kt by the gates rather than let speed decay.
What happened: The approach was flown too slow through the stabilisation gates, crossing the threshold at 132 kt against a VREF of 139 kt.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator against 139 kt from the first stabilisation gate onward.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 305 m and 152 m above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 305 m gate: speed 6 kt SLOW on the reference speed of 139 kt.
At the 152 m gate: speed 7 kt SLOW on the reference speed of 139 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,555 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,555 m of the 3,906 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 662 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Naples International Airport (LIRN), the Airbus A320 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took approximately 5 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. As the aircraft lined up on runway 24, the crew initiated the departure roll, and the aircraft lifted off the ground after a takeoff distance of 1,715 meters, which represented 84% of the available runway length. The liftoff speed was achieved at 160 knots, and the aircraft began its initial climb into the local weather conditions, which featured a temperature of 25°C and a light wind of 2 knots from a direction of 343°.
As the aircraft continued its enroute climb, it reached an altitude of 10,364 meters above sea level, an increase of 10,015.5 meters from the initial altitude of 348 meters. This climb phase took approximately 19 minutes and covered a distance of 110 nautical miles. The aircraft then transitioned into a level cruise, maintaining an altitude of 10,364 meters for 20 minutes while covering a distance of 142 nautical miles. The enroute descent phase began 2 miles south of Cascina, Italy, and the aircraft descended from 10,366 meters to 589 meters above sea level, a decrease of 9,777.1 meters, in 25 minutes and covering a distance of 140 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 35R at Milan Malpensa International Airport (LIMC) was initiated from the south, and the aircraft touched down on the runway after a total landing distance of 1,473 meters, which represented 49% of the available runway length. The touchdown speed was 122 knots, and the touchdown rate was -0.8 meters per second. Although the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline, the aircraft's rollout alignment was also slightly off-center. After a taxiing time of 4 minutes and a distance of less than 1 nautical mile, the aircraft arrived at the parking area, having completed a total flight distance of 400 nautical miles and consuming 3,118 kilograms of fuel in the process, which took a total of 76 minutes.
The final approach to runway 35R at LIMC Milan Malpensa International Airport was conducted from the south, with the aircraft heading 349.0° at 4 nm and 364.9 meters above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height and speed of 132 knots at touchdown. The touchdown point was located 245 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 122 knots and a rate of -0.8 meters per second, both of which were within acceptable limits.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 7.4 meters from the centreline, while the rollout alignment was also slightly off-centre by 9.5 meters. Despite these minor deviations, the overall landing performance was good, with a total landing distance of 1,473 meters, accounting for 49% of the runway length. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 23°C and a light wind of 1 knot from 84°, contributed to a stable and predictable approach.
The landing was scored 93.4%, reflecting the satisfactory approach quality, good threshold speed and height, and acceptable touchdown characteristics. However, the minor deviations from centreline alignment during rollout and touchdown may have contributed to the slightly lower score. Overall, the landing was considered safe and efficient, with the aircraft coming to a stop within a reasonable distance from the runway threshold.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values