Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,570 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 353 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, it's clear that there are areas for improvement in the aircraft landing performance based on the analysis of the different phases. However, it's important to remember that every landing is a learning opportunity and with dedication and practice, these issues can be addressed and improved upon.
Starting with the Approach Phase, the poor descent path above the glideslope limit indicates a need for better vertical control during descent. By focusing on maintaining the correct glide path, pilots can ensure a smoother transition to the Landing Phase.
In the Landing Phase, it's positive to note the good threshold height, which indicates proper alignment with the runway. However, the very poor landing flare and poor bank angle stability suggest the need for better control and coordination during the final approach and touchdown. By practicing proper flare technique and ensuring stable bank angles, pilots can achieve a smoother and more controlled landing.
Moving on to the Touchdown Phase, the heavy touchdown rate and slightly above target speed show room for improvement in control and precision during touchdown. It's also important to note the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being off-center, which indicates the need for better alignment and spatial awareness during landing.
In conclusion, while the landing score may be 87.0%, there are specific areas that can be targeted for improvement to achieve even better performance in future landings. By focusing on vertical and lateral control, flare technique, and touchdown precision, pilots can work towards achieving smoother, more precise landings. With dedication and practice, I am confident that the next landing will show significant improvement and closer alignment with performance goals. Keep up the hard work and continue striving for excellence in every aspect of flight operations.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values