Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Track the centreline
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 500 ft gate: centreline 1.0° off, against a 1° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,370 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 444 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight departed from runway 27 at KCXP Carson Airport, with a takeoff distance of 1,270 meters, which accounted for 69% of the runway length. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 141 knots, and began its initial climb shortly after departure. The enroute climb phase started approximately one mile west of the airport, where the aircraft ascended from 5,791 feet above sea level to 37,216 feet, a vertical increase of 31,425 feet, in 17 minutes and covering 112 nautical miles.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 45 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent, initially from 37,657 feet to 34,184 feet, a decrease of 3,473 feet, in 3 minutes and covering 20 nautical miles. The flight continued with multiple enroute climb and descent phases, interspersed with level cruise phases, as it navigated through various airspaces. Notably, the aircraft climbed from 34,226 feet to 38,952 feet, an increase of 4,726 feet, in 5 minutes and covering 41 nautical miles, and later descended from 38,985 feet to 4,269 feet, a decrease of 34,716 feet, in 21 minutes and covering 124 nautical miles.
The flight concluded with a final approach to runway 07R at KPHX Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, where the aircraft landed with a touchdown distance of 443 meters, which was 43% of the runway length. The touchdown speed was 123 knots, and the touchdown rate was -215 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.3 meters from the centerline. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile in 4 minutes. The total flight distance was 578 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 94 minutes, with a fuel consumption of 3,202 kilograms.
The aircraft touched down on runway 07R at KPHX Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport with a good threshold height, allowing for a smooth transition from the approach to the touchdown phase. The threshold speed of 128 kt was well within the acceptable range, indicating a well-executed approach. The touchdown distance of 443 m was also satisfactory, demonstrating the pilot's ability to control the aircraft's descent and speed.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed of 123 kt was good, but the touchdown rate of -215 fpm was only fair, suggesting a slightly higher-than-desired rate of descent. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.3 m from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the approach or a minor issue with the aircraft's directional control. Despite this, the local weather conditions, with a temperature of 28 °C and a gentle headwind of 4 kt, were favorable for the landing.
The aircraft's rollout was well-executed, with very good alignment on the runway centreline. The total landing distance of 1,021 m, which accounted for 43% of the runway length, was acceptable. Overall, the landing was considered to be of high quality, with a score of 98.4% reflecting the pilot's skill and attention to detail.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values