Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 24 stages, 23 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,097 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 479 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
While the aircraft landing score of 89.0% is relatively high, there are areas where improvements can be made to achieve an even better performance.
Starting with the Approach Phase, the poor descent path above glideslope limit indicates that the aircraft was not descending at the optimal rate, which could have led to a less smooth landing. To improve on this, pilots should ensure that they are following the correct descent path to maintain a stable approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the fact that the threshold height was above target and there was a very poor landing flare suggests that the approach to landing was not as precise as it could have been. Pilots should focus on achieving the correct threshold height and executing a proper landing flare to ensure a smoother touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, the hard touchdown rate, slightly above target speed, and landing point 57 meters beyond the touchdown zone all indicate that adjustments need to be made in the final moments of the landing. Pilots should aim for a softer touchdown, closer to the target speed, and within the designated touchdown zone to improve overall performance.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being off by 4.8 meters from the centerline suggests that adjustments were needed to maintain proper alignment during the rollout. Pilots should work on staying centered on the runway to improve overall landing accuracy.
Overall, while the aircraft landing score of 89.0% is commendable, focusing on these areas of improvement in the approach, landing, touchdown, and rollout phases can help pilots achieve an even higher level of performance in future landings. With practice and attention to detail, pilots can work towards consistently achieving smoother and more precise landings. Keep up the great work and continue striving for excellence in every aspect of aircraft operations.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values