Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the cruise
Enroute Level scored 98.26 % — Altitude held within ±626 ft of 2,176 ft asl at 94 % was the weak point. Fixed, this flight scores 99.81 %.
See Enroute Level
Start to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 4,864 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 445 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 4 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-600, then departed from runway 09 at Gibraltar Airport (LXGB), with a takeoff distance of 732 meters, which was 48% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 144 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions of 16°C temperature and a wind speed of 4 knots at 70°. The crosswind was 1 knot, and the headwind was 4 knots. After departing from Gibraltar, the aircraft began its enroute climb, which started overhead the airport and took the aircraft to an altitude of 38,997 feet above sea level. This climb phase covered a distance of 328 nautical miles and took 43 minutes, with an increase in altitude of 38,022 feet.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 5 miles northwest of Chlef Aboubakr Belkaid International Airport (DAOI) in Algeria. This cruise phase lasted for 306 minutes and covered a distance of 2,581 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, which started overhead Al Qatif in Saudi Arabia and took the aircraft down to an altitude of 2,507 feet above sea level. This descent phase covered a distance of 129 nautical miles and took 18 minutes, with a decrease in altitude of 36,505 feet.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 9 miles east of Al Wakrah in Qatar and lasted for 3 minutes, covering a distance of 11 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 34R at Hamad International Airport (OTHH) was made from the southeast, with a heading of 338.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,274 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 34R was successful, with a touchdown distance of 447 meters and a touchdown speed of 125 knots, which was fast. The touchdown rate was fair at -238 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 23°C temperature and a wind speed of 10 knots at 330°, with a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 9 knots.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking, which took 2 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 3,056 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 377 minutes. The aircraft used 14,763 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-600 aircraft successfully landed at OTHH Hamad International Airport on runway 34R, achieving a high score of 98.9%. The final approach was conducted from the southeast, heading 338.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,274 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft touched down on the runway with a speed of 125 knots, which was significantly above the target threshold speed. This indicates that the pilot had sufficient control over the aircraft's descent and was able to maintain a stable approach. The touchdown distance of 447 meters was also within acceptable limits, demonstrating the pilot's ability to manage the aircraft's speed and altitude during the landing.
However, the touchdown speed of 125 knots was considered fast, which may have resulted in a slightly higher touchdown rate of -238 feet per minute (fpm). This is not ideal, as a lower touchdown rate is generally preferred to minimize the risk of damage to the aircraft's landing gear and to ensure a smoother ride for passengers.
Despite the slightly high touchdown rate, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot had maintained a stable and controlled approach. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 23°C and a wind speed of 10 knots from 330°. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 knot, while the headwind component was 9 knots, which helped to reduce the aircraft's ground speed and make the landing more manageable.
The total landing distance of 928 meters was only 19% of the runway length, which is a good indication of the pilot's ability to control the aircraft's speed and altitude during the landing. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, demonstrating the pilot's ability to maintain control of the aircraft during the post-landing phase.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the pilot demonstrating good control and management of the aircraft throughout the approach and landing phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values