Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Level the wings with coordinated aileron to hold bank angle near zero during the initial climb, starting from 5.5°.
What happened: Bank angle was elevated during the initial climb and excess bank usually persists into the second climb segment.
Watch for: Attitude indicator, wings level with bank angle near zero degrees.
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,088 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 485 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A320 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Munich Airport, taking 13 minutes and covering a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 26R, with a takeoff distance of 1,528 meters, which was 38% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 165 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of departure were a temperature of 20°C, with a wind speed of 16 knots at 250°.
As the aircraft climbed away from Munich Airport, it began its enroute climb, which started overhead the airport. The climb took 27 minutes, during which the aircraft ascended from 2,463 feet above sea level to 37,680 feet above sea level, an increase of 35,217 feet. The enroute climb covered a distance of 187 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered a level cruise, which started overhead Este, Italy, and lasted for 56 minutes, covering a distance of 593 nautical miles.
The enroute descent began 31 miles east of Chebba, Tunisia, and took 21 minutes to descend from 38,834 feet above sea level to 2,309 feet above sea level, a decrease of 36,525 feet. The descent covered a distance of 109 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered another level cruise, which started 15 miles west of Djerba Zarzis International Airport, and lasted for 3 minutes, covering a distance of 11 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 09 at Djerba Zarzis International Airport was made from the west, with a heading of 88.0°, at a distance of 4 nautical miles and 1,277 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 09, which had a length of 3,088 meters. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 36°C, with a wind speed of 8 knots at 340°.
The touchdown point was 71 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 131 knots, which was a little fast. However, the touchdown rate was good at -185 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The total landing distance was 1,131 meters, which was 37% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking 2 minutes and covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 909 nautical miles, and the flight took 123 minutes to complete. The aircraft used 6,424 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at Djerba Zarzis International Airport, achieving a score of 99.8%. The aircraft approached the runway from the west, heading 88.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,277 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with precision, and the aircraft landed on runway 09, which has a length of 3,088 meters.
The threshold height was satisfactory, and the threshold speed was maintained at 138 knots, indicating a well-executed approach. However, the touchdown point was 71 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which may indicate a slight deviation from the intended landing spot. The touchdown speed of 131 knots was slightly faster than the desired speed, but the touchdown rate of -185 feet per minute (fpm) was within the acceptable range.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 36°C and a wind speed of 8 knots from 340°. The crosswind component was 8 knots, while the tailwind component was 3 knots. Despite these conditions, the aircraft maintained perfect runway touchdown alignment, indicating a high degree of control and precision during the landing.
The total landing distance was 1,131 meters, which corresponds to 37% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was well-controlled throughout the landing process. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, demonstrating the pilot's ability to maintain control and stability during the landing roll.
Overall, the landing was executed with a high degree of precision and control, resulting in a score of 99.8%. The aircraft's performance was impressive, considering the challenging weather conditions and the requirement to land on a runway with a relatively short length.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values