Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the pattern downwind leg
Spacing cues are relative to your eyepoint, so two simmers with different FOV settings following the same wingtip cue fly patterns half a mile different in width, and a wide FOV compresses depth so the runway on base looks further away than it is, biasing you towards a late turn. Pick a camera position and FOV, save it, and never change it, because every judgement you calibrate is calibrated to that picture.
Read more in Pattern WorkStart to finish · 13 stages, 11 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate for a circuit: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate is an instrument-approach check and does not apply.
Side view — the last 6,112 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 6,112 ft of the 11,982 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 2,753 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Boeing 787-9 started with a departure roll from runway 06L at KNKX Miramar Marine Corps Air Station - Mitscher Field. The takeoff distance was 3,368 ft, which accounted for 28% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 152 knots. The local weather at the time of departure was a temperature of 66°F with a wind speed of 5 knots at 21°, resulting in a crosswind of 4 knots and a headwind of 3 knots.
After taking off, the aircraft made a right-hand pattern entry from runway 06L at KNKX Miramar Marine Corps Air Station - Mitscher Field, covering a distance of less than 1 nm in 23 seconds. This was followed by a right-hand pattern crosswind from the same runway, covering a distance of less than 1 nm in 16 seconds. The pattern downwind turn was then performed, covering a distance of 3 nm at an angle to the runway of 35.5°. The pattern downwind leg followed, covering less than 1 nm in 21 seconds.
The landing took place on runway 24R at KNKX Miramar Marine Corps Air Station - Mitscher Field, with a runway length of 11,982 ft. The height at the threshold was 42 ft above ground level, and the speed at the threshold was 148 knots. The touchdown occurred 2,757 ft from the threshold, with a touchdown speed of 132 knots and a vertical speed indicator reading of -211 ft/min. The local weather at the time of landing was a temperature of 61°F with a wind speed of 4 knots at 30°, resulting in a crosswind of 3 knots and a tailwind of 3 knots. The total landing distance was 5,859 ft, accounting for 49% of the runway.
Overall, the total flight distance was 6 nm, taking 232 seconds and using 1,147 lbs of fuel.
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 94.1% is quite impressive, showcasing a high level of proficiency in various aspects of the landing procedure. One of the standout strengths was observed in the Approach Phase, where the glideslope alignment was excellent. This indicates that the pilot maintained a stable descent path towards the runway, ensuring a smooth transition for the landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, while the threshold height was good, it is worth noting that the landing flare was identified as very poor. This suggests that there might have been some challenges in properly adjusting the pitch angle of the aircraft just before touchdown, potentially leading to a harder than ideal landing. Improving the landing flare technique could further enhance the overall landing performance.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was fair and the speed was on target, both of which are crucial factors in ensuring a safe and controlled landing. However, the touchdown point being 1400 ft beyond the touchdown zone is a significant deviation that should be addressed. Additionally, landing with a 3 kn tailwind can introduce additional complexities and should be avoided whenever possible to ensure optimal safety during landing.
Despite the above challenges, the runway touchdown position was noted as very good, indicating that the aircraft touched down at the desired point on the runway. This demonstrates good spatial awareness and precision during the landing process.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was very good, showcasing the pilot's ability to maintain the aircraft centered on the runway during the rollout. This further contributes to the overall smoothness and accuracy of the landing.
Overall, while there were some areas for improvement, achieving a landing score of 94.1% is commendable. By focusing on refining the landing flare technique, addressing deviations in touchdown point and avoiding tailwind landings, the pilot can further enhance their landing performance and strive for even higher scores in future flights. Keep up the good work and continue to prioritize safety and precision in all aspects of flight operations.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values