Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smaller, smoother aileron inputs to hold the climb bank angle near wings-level.
What happened: During Climb 3 the bank angle averaged 6.1°, well beyond a steady wings-level climb.
Watch for: Attitude indicator - bank angle, keeping it close to wings-level through the climb.
Arrival
Hold the approach speed back toward 45 ft with power and let the aircraft descend to the normal flare band before rounding out.
What happened: The flare began early at 64 ft, well above the normal band, and the aircraft touched down fast at 154 kt against a vref of 136 kt. An early flare like this usually carries extra speed through to touchdown rather than bleeding it off.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and start the flare within the normal band near 45 ft.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: seven checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
At the 500 ft gate: sink rate above what the glideslope needed, off the runway's 3° glideslope and speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,750 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,750 m of the 3,044 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 770 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Munich Airport (EDDM), the Airbus A320 began its journey on runway 26L, taking 13 minutes to taxi to the runway and covering 4 nautical miles. With a local temperature of 7 °C and wind conditions of 15 kt at 300 °, the aircraft lifted off the ground at a speed of 168 kt, utilizing 33% of the 1,322-meter runway.
As the aircraft climbed to its initial cruising altitude, it passed overhead Hallbergmoos, Bavaria, Germany, and continued to ascend to 26,554 feet above sea level, an increase of 24,000 feet in 13 minutes, covering 86 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise phase started 2 miles south east of Ipsheim, lasting 108 minutes and covering 789 nautical miles. The aircraft then began a second climb phase, this time from 26,457 feet to 26,998 feet above sea level, an increase of 541 feet in 2 minutes, covering 12 nautical miles. Following this, the aircraft entered another level cruise phase, lasting 66 minutes and covering 490 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent from 27,007 feet above sea level to 3,018 feet above sea level, a decrease of 23,989 feet in 12 minutes, covering 78 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 19 at Keflavik International Airport (BIKF) was initiated from the north, with the aircraft touching down 495 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The landing distance of 1,811 meters was 59% of the 3,044-meter runway, with a touchdown speed of 154 kt and a touchdown rate of -249 fpm. The aircraft then taxied to the parking area, taking 9 minutes to cover 2 nautical miles. The total flight distance was 1,474 nautical miles, taking 219 minutes and utilizing 2 kg of fuel.
The final approach to runway 19 at BIKF Keflavik International Airport was initiated from the north, heading 179.0° at 2 nm and 1,944 ft above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a steady descent rate and a stable airspeed. However, the threshold height at 109 ft agl was excessively over target, indicating a slightly high approach path. The threshold speed of 156 kt was also too high, suggesting a need for more aggressive descent or a higher approach speed.
The aircraft touched down 495 m beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 154 kt, which was too fast. The touchdown rate of -249 fpm was fair, indicating a relatively smooth touchdown. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.3 m from the centreline, which may have contributed to the slightly high threshold speed. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 2 °C and a wind of 12 kt at 130°, resulted in a crosswind of 9 kt and a headwind of 8 kt.
The total landing distance of 1,811 m was 59% of the runway length, indicating a relatively long rollout. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 11.8 m from the centreline, which may have been a result of the initial touchdown position. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, but with some room for improvement, particularly in terms of approach speed and touchdown position. The final score of 74.8% reflects the satisfactory but not exceptional performance.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values